Search this Topic:
Dec 4 09 12:22 AM
Dec 4 09 2:15 AM
Dec 4 09 10:06 AM
Dec 4 09 1:22 PM
Dec 4 09 1:59 PM
Dec 4 09 10:22 PM
Dec 5 09 2:47 AM
Dec 5 09 5:32 AM
the burden of proof always lies with the party making a claim.
Dec 5 09 6:22 PM
Dec 5 09 7:34 PM
Dec 5 09 7:40 PM
Dec 5 09 10:54 PM
When it comes to paranormal things, belief / believers are usually just plain more entertaining than their opposites. I don't mean
in a figure of fun way (which to me is an incredibly worn-out thing), I mean entertaining, period. It's like religion - religious people are just plain
more interesting on the subject of religion than atheists.
Dec 6 09 1:20 AM
Dec 6 09 4:42 AM
Dec 6 09 5:24 PM
Dec 6 09 8:25 PM
Dec 6 09 11:00 PM
Ted Newsom wrote:
Far's I know, Chambers was pretty solidly employed through the 1960s and 70s. All show biz people have down times, but given his reputation, I can't
imagine a stretch of unemployment long enough for him to negotiate for, design, construct and deliver a first class hairy Sasquatch suit-- and given his
position in the business, I also can't see him reducing his rate down to the peanuts a fringe character like Patterson could afford.
And THAT scenario brings up the question, "Did John Chambers even HAVE a lab at home?" Since most make-up effects guys today are freelance, they
often convert their garage into a make-up lab, just because they need someplace to work-- but is there any indication at all that Chambers had such a place
in the era we're concerned with?
Dec 7 09 9:09 AM
© 2016 Yuku. All rights reserved.