ForgotPassword?
Sign Up
Search this Topic:
Forum Jump
Nov 5 06 1:18 AM
Nov 5 06 1:41 AM
Nov 5 06 2:10 AM
Nov 5 06 10:57 AM
Nov 5 06 11:05 AM
Quote:A brief make-up test of a couple minutes' duration sounds more likely than the oft-offered "two reels." What did they do for the rest of the time, throw pies?
Nov 5 06 11:17 AM
Quote:But the interpretation of the role doesn't mean the make-up was similar. Given the story and the character's place in it, you can pretty much guess the elements: confusion, wonder, anger, fury, etc. You can find those elements in Christopher Lee's interpretation, deNiro's, and Charles Ogle's...
Nov 5 06 12:07 PM
Quote:Well obviously Lugosi was very much into being in the film and most likely wanted the monster to do more than grunt and gesture. When Lugosi later stated he rejected the role of the Monster because of lack of dialogue...he says "I convinced the studio that the part did not have meat enough."
Nov 5 06 12:43 PM
Quote:Whale further stated that he wanted somebody "more likeable" than Lugosi. "He talked about the fact that Lugosi was basically scary and scared audiences", Lambert recalled, "and he said the Monster, in his view, although he could scare people, was also scared".
Nov 5 06 12:52 PM
Nov 5 06 2:22 PM
Nov 5 06 3:01 PM
Nov 5 06 3:03 PM
Burgomaster
Nov 5 06 3:14 PM
Nov 5 06 3:26 PM
Nov 5 06 3:42 PM
Nov 5 06 3:52 PM
Nov 5 06 3:56 PM
Quote:In "It's Alive", doesn't Greg Mank the studio bigwigs cracked up when they saw the test? Not sure what his source was for that.
Nov 5 06 4:00 PM
Nov 5 06 4:05 PM
Share This