ForgotPassword?
Sign Up
Search this Topic:
Forum Jump
Aug 29 13 9:17 AM
Burgomaster
Latarnia wrote:GaryP11111 wrote: Among the transgressions noted was the singular word "experimenting" and the phrase "became a full-time cameraman". The posts have been deleted, but I don't see either of the above examples in the comparisons. I do have accurate examples of the transgressions, which are not as obviously non-problematic, even ridiculous, as the above.Mirek
GaryP11111 wrote: Among the transgressions noted was the singular word "experimenting" and the phrase "became a full-time cameraman".
Aug 29 13 9:41 AM
Aug 29 13 9:54 AM
Latarnia wrote:When the Lianne Spiderbaby commentary was happening, the consensus was that a small amount of borrowing (a sentence/phrase here or there) did matter. Clearly, something's up when exact phrases (and not just one word) are used in both articles under examination. I don't think there is any definition of plagiarism that offers a free pass or invalidates the charge of plagiarism due to a borrowing of just several parts from the original source. From what I remember, no one was accused outright of plagiarism in this matter, and whatever suspicions arose were lessened considerably by the reputation of one of the writers, so that pains were taken to offer up a simple and not damning explanation: That both writers used a similar PR source.The genie left that bottle once the topic was raised, so it's out there, despite the removal, a few days later, of the discussion here that named the writers and the articles in question.Mirek
Aug 29 13 10:01 AM
GaryP11111 wrote:Latarnia wrote:GaryP11111 wrote: Among the transgressions noted was the singular word "experimenting" and the phrase "became a full-time cameraman". The posts have been deleted, but I don't see either of the above examples in the comparisons. I do have accurate examples of the transgressions, which are not as obviously non-problematic, even ridiculous, as the above.Mirek Really? They were highlighted in red in YOUR "Let's go to the video" post.
Aug 29 13 10:03 AM
JohnMGM wrote:Latarnia wrote:GaryP11111 wrote: Among the transgressions noted was the singular word "experimenting" and the phrase "became a full-time cameraman". The posts have been deleted, but I don't see either of the above examples in the comparisons. I do have accurate examples of the transgressions, which are not as obviously non-problematic, even ridiculous, as the above.MirekThen, by all means, post these examples on Latarnia.
Aug 29 13 10:17 AM
Aug 29 13 10:30 AM
Latarnia wrote:GaryP11111 wrote:Latarnia wrote:GaryP11111 wrote: Among the transgressions noted was the singular word "experimenting" and the phrase "became a full-time cameraman". The posts have been deleted, but I don't see either of the above examples in the comparisons. I do have accurate examples of the transgressions, which are not as obviously non-problematic, even ridiculous, as the above.Mirek Really? They were highlighted in red in YOUR "Let's go to the video" post.Which was a copy of the original post on the matter. Both deleted now. But though both posts are gone, I'm sure that the two examples offered by you were not just stand-alones, but part of something more tangible. Nevertheless, since then, I have done comparisons myself, and in my examples neither of those two mentions come up.Mirek
Aug 29 13 10:52 AM
Aug 29 13 11:55 AM
Aug 29 13 12:14 PM
Aug 29 13 12:48 PM
GaryP11111 wrote: you can play Grand Inquisitor to your hearts content
you can play Grand Inquisitor to your hearts content
Aug 29 13 1:41 PM
Aug 29 13 2:05 PM
Dr Spyclops wrote:Unless someone from the board has contacted him directly, the author in question may be entirely unaware of any comments made on this thread. According to his YUKU profile, he hasn't been seen on the CHFB since mid-March. (Just noticed that Gary also mentioned this on the previous page but I think it's a point worth repeating.)
Aug 29 13 2:35 PM
Aug 29 13 3:04 PM
gef the talking mongoose wrote:Dr Spyclops wrote:Unless someone from the board has contacted him directly, the author in question may be entirely unaware of any comments made on this thread. According to his YUKU profile, he hasn't been seen on the CHFB since mid-March. (Just noticed that Gary also mentioned this on the previous page but I think it's a point worth repeating.)I don't care one way or the other, I guess, since in my ignorance I'm unaware of this man & his work, but as it happens he supposedly was alerted to certain comments here. I assume the post to that effect was excised with all the others.
Aug 29 13 3:34 PM
Aug 29 13 6:31 PM
Aug 29 13 7:25 PM
Wich2 wrote:
Aug 29 13 7:37 PM
Aug 30 13 3:32 PM
Share This