ForgotPassword?
Sign Up
Search this Topic:
Forum Jump
Jan 26 13 1:45 AM
Jan 26 13 2:20 AM
Jan 26 13 10:08 AM
Jan 26 13 10:15 AM
Jan 26 13 1:54 PM
Jan 26 13 4:13 PM
http://Cinemadave.Livejournal.com"...for those who enjoy the entire experience of movies, from the promotional hype to the criticism given at the dinner table....."
Jan 26 13 5:51 PM
Jan 26 13 7:12 PM
Jan 26 13 7:56 PM
delgadosaur wrote:if the treks were so brainy before Abrams came along, then how come most of the movies are pretty mediocre excursions? I mean, that Kirk/Picard picture.... and I never even saw the last trek before Abrams'.
Jan 26 13 11:15 PM
Jan 27 13 2:45 AM
Jan 27 13 10:01 AM
Jan 27 13 12:29 PM
Jan 27 13 1:57 PM
Carl Eyesnheart wrote: We are quite advanced from 1950, that is for sure, but we are nowhere near as advanced as that time period was expecting us to be.
Jan 27 13 2:02 PM
Jan 27 13 3:43 PM
HalLane wrote:...salt shaker medical equipment...
Jan 27 13 4:22 PM
Carl Eyesnheart wrote:We have no idea where technology might be that far into the future.
Jan 27 13 8:58 PM
CapnDunsel wrote:But the one huge change they cant explain is Spock's behavior. Except for two very brief moments in the original series (when he sees Kirk alive in Amok Time, and feels the Vulcan crew die in Immunity Syndrome), he's only acted emotionally when he was compromised by aliens, drugs, etc.
Jan 28 13 1:01 AM
Jan 28 13 7:25 AM
Green Hornet wrote:Just as long as Lucas has no influence over the script and how it's produced, I'll go see this. I like Abrams, and I tolerate STAR WARS (first one's great, second one's OK, third one's watchable, prequels are vomit-inducing). I wish that people would make real sci-fi films instead of this space opera stuff. It's fun to watch but real sci-fi blows it out of the water almost every time.
Share This