ForgotPassword?
Sign Up
Search this Topic:
Forum Jump
Jun 26 12 12:13 PM
Jun 26 12 12:51 PM
Jun 26 12 3:04 PM
Carl Eyesnheart wrote:I still have yet to see this, and I fear that all of my desire has been sapped from me due to the considerable amount of heartbreak that surrounds this film.
Jun 26 12 3:18 PM
skelton knaggs wrote: Carl Eyesnheart wrote: I still have yet to see this, and I fear that all of my desire has been sapped from me due to the considerable amount of heartbreak that surrounds this film.Like most of Ridley Scott's films, this is easy on the eye. Even wondrous to behold. Just maybe check your brain at the door.
Carl Eyesnheart wrote: I still have yet to see this, and I fear that all of my desire has been sapped from me due to the considerable amount of heartbreak that surrounds this film.
Jun 26 12 3:42 PM
Jun 26 12 4:31 PM
Jun 27 12 2:14 AM
Jun 27 12 12:10 PM
Uncle Bingo wrote: Also, if Shaw was pregnant with her obviously infected boyfriend's "baby" - wouldn't she have the same infection now?
Jun 27 12 1:13 PM
Jun 27 12 2:50 PM
Victor Frankenstein wrote: It's possible that his sperm was weird on a DNA-level rather than 'infected'. (Just tossing out some explanations for what is unexplainable...)
Jun 27 12 5:10 PM
Jul 1 12 4:58 PM
Jul 1 12 6:23 PM
Jul 1 12 7:33 PM
Tragg wrote:So it's another empty and pretentious spectacle due to be lauded as a classic?
Jul 1 12 11:26 PM
Jul 2 12 12:50 AM
Jul 2 12 4:00 PM
Jul 2 12 4:12 PM
Jul 3 12 10:25 AM
Hjalmar Poelzig wrote:Tragg wrote:So it's another empty and pretentious spectacle due to be lauded as a classic? It's funny how forty years later 2001 still gets strong reactions from people isn't it?The reason I thought of 2001 was that in both films, an advanced civilization leaves clues for humankind about their origins. And both films have journeys into space to find that advanced civilization.Both films ask questions but provide no answers. It's up to the viewer to decide what the directors are trying to say.
Jul 3 12 10:34 AM
Godziwolf wrote: Hjalmar Poelzig wrote: Tragg wrote: So it's another empty and pretentious spectacle due to be lauded as a classic? It's funny how forty years later 2001 still gets strong reactions from people isn't it?The reason I thought of 2001 was that in both films, an advanced civilization leaves clues for humankind about their origins. And both films have journeys into space to find that advanced civilization.Both films ask questions but provide no answers. It's up to the viewer to decide what the directors are trying to say.2001 had HAL, who is still one of science fiction's best characters.
Hjalmar Poelzig wrote: Tragg wrote: So it's another empty and pretentious spectacle due to be lauded as a classic? It's funny how forty years later 2001 still gets strong reactions from people isn't it?The reason I thought of 2001 was that in both films, an advanced civilization leaves clues for humankind about their origins. And both films have journeys into space to find that advanced civilization.Both films ask questions but provide no answers. It's up to the viewer to decide what the directors are trying to say.
Tragg wrote: So it's another empty and pretentious spectacle due to be lauded as a classic?
Share This