ForgotPassword?
Sign Up
Search this Topic:
Forum Jump
Sep 24 12 5:53 PM
flashback wrote:i liked how the scotland yard inspector looked at his bite by the werewolf and it dawned on him the same thing would happen to him.
Nov 21 12 11:44 AM
Servant of Legendre wrote:Yeah, I can see flaws in THE WOLF-MAN, but after the absymal atrocity of those MUMMY movies, it's like eating prime salmon after a bowl of catfood.
Jan 6 13 11:02 AM
Jan 6 13 2:17 PM
Jan 9 13 4:19 PM
mrbluesky wrote:I saw this film when it came out and had very high hopes for it, having seen the trailer for it at Comicon I believe 2 years prior. The beginning, minus the introductory gore, was quite compelling and mysterious. Then, however the film took a very sharp turn for the worse, losing all its mystery in one scene and plummeted toward an ending reminiscent of War of the Gargantuas (a film which, by the way, never forgets what it is). The problem with most remakes is philosophical. When the tone of the original is completely changed the connection is lost. The Hammer films accomplished this departure through an original approach. When their own films changed their tone, they also lost connection with what made them great. In the Wolfman, the difference is monumental but the approach pedestrian; in the original, no one believes Larry Talbot. He doesn't believe it himself at first. Between Maleva and Sir John, we are given two ways of perceiving truth in the tale and it retains its mystery right up to the end. In fact, even then the mystery remains. In the new film EVERYone believes in werewolves from the start and any remaining sense of mystery is abandoned during the asylum scene. This is far more the approach of newer films and has no philosophical connection to the old. Everything is shown in realistic detail, in full light until there can be no doubt that werewolves exist. The magic is thereby undone. In fact, the beast himself is more like Superman than the Wolfman. Unfortunately, the terrific make-up by Rick Baker is misused by over-exposure. I must add that the film has its moments, however, its strengths are simply swept away by its overwhelming weaknesses. The conception of Sir John, his estate, his mysterious servant are very compelling elements. The moment where we first recognize the truth about Sir John is quite eerie, though it comes after the film is irretrievably lost. The titanic battle at the end, had it followed a remarkable movie and had it been done with any cinematic artfulness could have been fantastic. As it is, it was ridiculous. JBS
Share This