Tom Cruise To Take Hugh Jackman's Place in "Van Helsing" Reboot in Coming Soon Forum

0 Points

Forum Jump

Tom Cruise To Take Hugh Jackman's Place in "Van Helsing" Reboot

Author	Comment
Gojira		#21	[-]
May 3 12 6:07 AM Reply Quote More My Recent Posts	Will he be warding off vampires with copies of Battlefield Earth?
Joe Karlosi		#22	[-]
May 3 12 9:14 AM Reply Quote More My Recent Posts	Hey, let's be thankful. Coulda been Jack Black. "Guy named Squeamy got thrown from the fifth floor. He's deader'n a mackerel."
BijouBob8mm		#23	[-]
May 3 12 12:20 PM Reply Quote More My Recent Posts	VAN HELSING is one of the worst films I've ever seen, so it can only be an improvement. My biggest concern over this is not that a good VAN HELSING film couldn't be made, but comes from Tom Cruise in the title role; incredible miscasting. Hey, let's be thankful. Coulda been Jack Black. Or Ashton Kutcher.
MacXoftheMounted		#24	[-]
May 3 12 12:24 PM Reply Quote More My Recent Posts	They could cast Justin Beiber for all I care. Fool me once... MacXoftheMounted.....................formerly known as Professor Von X
delgadosaur		#25	[-]
May 3 12 1:09 PM Reply Quote More My Recent Posts	This all proves that Story and Direction are everything, since I agree with other posters that this property certainly deserves rebooting. Boy, I remember just sitting in the theater and FUMING while I watched that artistic catastrophy of a so-called picture.
dracsback		#26	[-]
May 3 12 1:14 PM Reply Quote More My Recent Posts	tonyrivers wrote: Let's not forget this is not the 1930's or 1940's....and who the target audience is. It's NOT us monster kids who grew up on the Universal classics..... if you expect the worst and hope for the best maybe we'll get something in between..... True and now I know that Orci/Kurtzman are involved - I am somewhat interested to see what they come up with. But NOT with Tom Cruise. I just don't see that. It's like accepting John Cusack as Edgar Allen Poe. "I saw what I saw when I saw it!"
MacXoftheMounted		#27	[-]
May 3 12 1:29 PM Reply Quote More My Recent Posts	Bieber would have rocked Poe as well. ; ) MacXoftheMounted.....................formerly known as Professor Von X
BijouBob8mm		#28	[-]
May 4 12 8:47 AM Reply Quote More My Recent Posts	Boy, I remember just sitting in the theater and FUMING while I watched that artistic catastrophy of a so-called picture. Sadly there are some scattered moments that are good, leaving us to imagine the things that might have been. This is a movie where the score outshines/outclasses the film. Check out the CD, as the music is worth hearing on its own.
lencandraw		#29	[-]
May 11 12 4:53 PM Reply Quote More My Recent Posts	I always thought VAN HELSING was an interesting idea (even a very good one), but poorly executed through bad writing- especially the "jokes" and hammy acting. Too bad. THIS movie looks to be a superturd that may make us long for the days of Sommer.
ejazzyjeff		#30	[-]
May 15 12 11:43 AM Reply Quote More My Recent Posts	Gojira wrote: Will he be warding off vampires with copies of Battlefield Earth? Is there anything in Scientology that can be used?
tonyrivers		#31	[-]
May 15 12 12:23 PM Reply Quote More My Recent Posts	There is always the possibility that if the monsters are done properly that the movie may be good in spite of Tom Cruise.
G Vallejo		#32	[-]
May 15 12 1:20 PM Reply Quote More My Recent Posts	Tom might not be necessarily bad. He was all right as Lestat, although not what I think anyone was picturing in the role. Anne Rice liked him, after all. But if the movie itself is all right, I don't think Tom will the one to sink it. Today I saw pictures of him prancing around in makeup and fake tattoos for some new movie where he plays a rock star. I'll be avoiding that like the plague, but you never know... he could be good as Van Helsing. A perfect Monster has no end...
flashback		#33	[-]
May 15 12 4:53 PM Reply Quote More My Recent Posts	we need to get away from the universal action/horror when the universal monsters are used.
GaryP11111		#34	[-]
May 15 12 10:53 PM Burgomaster Reply Quote More My Recent Posts	Hey, doesn't "reboot" actually mean to kick someone in the balls again? Because if it does, then yeah, I'd like them to reboot VAN HELSING. GARY L. PRANGE "Sic gorgiamus allos subjectos nunc." Check out my YouTube Video of the Week! (updated 8-3-09)
MacXoftheMounted		#35	[-]
May 16 12 11:26 AM Reply Quote More My Recent Posts	>Today I saw pictures of him prancing around in makeup and fake tattoos for some new movie where he plays a rock star. I'll be avoiding that like the plague, Man, I saw that a while back, too. Looked like a new low for him AND Hollywood. Can't even remember the title. Didn't even look like a real movie from the trailer. Just dreadful and embarrassing. It will make MILLIONS. MacXoftheMounted.....................formerly known as Professor Von X
tonyrivers		#36	[-]
May 22 12 10:02 PM Reply Quote More My Recent Posts	It's called ROCK OF AGES and based on the Broadway play of the same name. Of course now Cruise is being attached to a remake of THE MAGNIFICENT SEVEN. But not anytime soon.
Wich2		#37	[-]
May 23 12 11:02 AM Reply Quote More My Recent Posts	>Hey, doesn't "reboot" actually mean to kick someone in the balls again? Because if it does, then yeah, I'd like them to reboot VAN HELSING.< Priceless, Gary! Thanks, -Craig
The Batman of Gotham		#38	[-]
May 23 12 12:15 PM Reply Quote More My Recent Posts	flashback wrote: we need to get away from the universal action/horror when the universal monsters are used. I agree - but I'm not so much opposed to there being action in my horror movies ( HORROR OF DRACULA, anyone? ). It's just that the action - and special effects - should be believable and not look as though we're watching some videogame! VAN HELSING looked as though it was live action combined with TOY STORY computer graphics! And there should actually be some real HORROR involved. Universal's recent WOLFMAN was done much better but, it was still a little too adolescent minded for my taste. I am so not looking forward to this remake. - GJS
Great Ape		#39	[-]
May 23 12 12:29 PM Reply Quote More My Recent Posts	Dudley Manlove wrote: Hugh is so much a better actor than Tom ever was. So one assumes its about old Tom fans still believing he has Boxoffice clout. Either that or its another Scientology try at saving a career. He is? I like Hugh Jackman, but I've never considered him "great" in anything. Very good as Wolverine and his role in The Prestige... I've found Cruise to be quite convincing in many, many roles. He's perfect in the Mission Impossible films. He was terrific in "Born on the Fourth of July," "A Few Good Men," "Rain Man," "Risky Business," "The Last Samurai," "Valkyrie," etc. He's a wack job in real life maybe, but he's been quite good and very effective in most of the films he's starred in.

<< Previous Topic Next Topic >>

Add Reply

Yuku free message boards

Tom Cruise To Take Hugh Jackman's Place in "Van Helsing" Reboot