G.I. Joe Retaliation in Coming Soon Forum

0 Points

<< Previous Topic Next Topic >>

G.I. Joe Retaliation

Author	Comment
Mattel Jones	G.I. Joe Retaliation	Lead	[-]
Dec 13 11 10:39 AM Reply Quote More My Recent Posts	� http://insidemovies.ew.co...joe-retaliation-trailer/ Big stoopid fun from the other Hasbro Toy/Film franchise. Dwayne Johnson is perfectly cast as a living action figure. The last part is cute too. The Expendables for little boys. Heh. Last Edited By: Mattel Jones Dec 14 11 7:19 PM. Edited 1 time.
Maximillian		#1	[-]
Jan 1 12 10:08 AM Reply Quote More My Recent Posts	I feel a lot of shame admitting this, but I kind of.... Oh God, I can't say it but I know I must! Must...get this...off...my chest! I want to see this. I feel so dirty....so, so dirty. I endured the first one just to see Sienna and Rachel in their black fetishistic gear. I can't say no to that. But I did say no to everything else. And could the second one be any good? Hell, the first one was so bad I think it couldn't be possible that the second one could be any worse. And Stephen Sommers isn't directing this one (Hooray!). And they appear to have gotten rid of those dumb lips on Snake Eyes's mask (again I say Hooray!). But Channing Tatum is returning as Duke (Boo! Hiss!). All I want out of this movie is a fun time. I want my seven dollars worth (or whatever matinee prices will be this summer). That's all. Good action, likable characters, dialogue that doesn't make one cringe, and sexy ladies dressed in kinky clothing who can hold their own in dangerous situations without being too nasty. I don't think that's too much to ask for. Do you?
Carl Eyesnheart		#2	[-]
Jan 2 12 11:32 PM Reply Quote More My Recent Posts	The trailer looks like a lot of fun. My fanzine all about Rock N Roll: www.sonicruin.com
flashback		#3	[-]
Apr 30 12 1:28 PM Reply Quote More My Recent Posts	is it just me or has the action film of today generally become too kanetic and not nearly as entertaining as in the 80`s and the early 90`s. i would like to see more action movies made like bruce willis` last boy scout .or the die hard movies that avoided the fight and action scenes with camera angles changing every 2 seconds even in the last one. matrix effects were good in the matrix films but are used where they are inappropirate now.like in babylon a.d. . why have the best female action star michelle yeoh in a movie fight if the camera shifts angles too fast and her moves can`t be appriciated?
Jameson281		#4	[-]
May 23 12 5:01 PM Reply Quote More My Recent Posts	Release has been postponed to 2013 to convert the film to 3-D.
delgadosaur		#5	[-]
May 23 12 7:19 PM Reply Quote More My Recent Posts	I think that anyone who sees this film should be taxed at a slightly higher rate than the rest of us.
Mattel Jones		#6	[-]
May 23 12 7:29 PM Reply Quote More My Recent Posts	delgadosaur wrote: I think that anyone who sees this film should be taxed at a slightly higher rate than the rest of us. Why? I'd think the last thing anybody working in the movie business would want to do is discourage people from paying good money to see stupid films. PS: I know you're just kidding. So am I.
Maximillian		#7	[-]
May 23 12 9:01 PM Reply Quote More My Recent Posts	"3-D? Oooooh, I'm dying!" "Say pardon me, but could you help out a fellow American who's down on his luck?" Last Edited By: Maximillian May 24 12 10:51 AM. Edited 1 times.
delgadosaur		#8	[-]
May 24 12 12:22 PM Reply Quote More My Recent Posts	The girl is the suit is the right kind of wrong though.

<< Previous Topic Next Topic >>

Add Reply