ForgotPassword?
Sign Up
Search this Topic:
Forum Jump
Dec 18 11 6:02 PM
Dec 26 11 9:49 PM
Dec 27 11 8:11 AM
Dec 27 11 12:54 PM
Dec 27 11 2:31 PM
Dec 27 11 5:35 PM
Dec 27 11 7:57 PM
Ted Newsom wrote:There was a Lovecraft pastische a couple years ago, done as if it were "discovered" from the silent era.
Dec 28 11 12:55 PM
Dec 28 11 2:01 PM
Dec 28 11 3:05 PM
Dec 29 11 10:52 PM
Dec 30 11 6:46 AM
Dec 30 11 8:05 AM
Tim Hammell wrote:Been waffling on this but now sounds like a must see, hope it lasts until the end of next week.
Dec 30 11 9:14 AM
Jan 4 12 3:27 PM
Jan 4 12 4:05 PM
Jan 4 12 7:25 PM
Jan 5 12 6:23 AM
pulp novelties wrote: I really had no issues at all other than that the lead female looked slightly different than what I think would have been popular back in the day, but this is a very minor quibble with an otherwise thoroughly entertaining film.
Jan 6 12 12:18 AM
todmichel wrote:Quote: "I can't figure out how the films creators got money to finance such a nifty film with such limited commercial potential, but it's cool that they did." They "got the money" for several reasons. Don't forget that the two previous movies made by the same director / actor team were huge successes, so the commercial potential was almost certain, in this country at least. And moreover, movies are considered as an art here, so a large part of the budget often comes from our Cultural Department.
Jan 6 12 1:38 PM
Share This