ForgotPassword?
Sign Up
Search this Topic:
Forum Jump
Nov 28 10 12:42 PM
Nov 28 10 1:22 PM
the Saw films actually have less torture than most in the sense of sadism or masochism, as most "torture" is self-inflicted by the characters
Nov 29 10 6:33 AM
Dec 3 10 12:34 AM
Michael Elliott wrote:The not-fiction part could take this discussion into a much wider direction. I'm not sure if you'd agree but one could say that DELIVERANCE or TAXI DRIVER were much more frightening than THE THING or FRANKENSTEIN simply because those films deal with real monsters. Some people simply can't be scared of something they know is fake or something they don't believe in no matter how well made it is.
Dec 3 10 12:41 AM
Joe Karlosi wrote:He also thought the special effects which were once considered to be "too graphic" were actually "cheesy"!THE THING, in comparison to what is featured in horror movies now, is no longer considered "too strong." But just like my examples of how FRANKENSTEIN and THE RAVEN affected viewers in the 1930s, Carpenter's film was also equally potent and "off-putting" back in its time. I never thought I'd say this, but I'll now say that John Carpenter's THE THING is actually a tame old horror movie.
Dec 3 10 12:43 AM
Joe Karlosi wrote:Writer Luke Y. Thompson of OC Weekly argued that unlike Hostel, the Saw films actually have less torture than most in the sense of sadism or masochism, as most "torture" is self-inflicted by the characters (and sometimes inevitable).
Dec 3 10 6:51 AM
Dec 11 10 10:05 PM
Dec 12 10 2:27 AM
Lobo Lives wrote:These aren't anything revolutionary or anything. They are just rip offs of Category III films from Japan in the 90s.
Dec 12 10 3:45 PM
Sep 3 11 10:56 AM
Sep 3 11 12:38 PM
Sep 3 11 2:23 PM
Sep 3 11 3:34 PM
Sep 3 11 3:50 PM
Sep 3 11 5:30 PM
Sep 3 11 5:36 PM
Sep 3 11 7:29 PM
Sep 4 11 2:59 AM
Feb 6 12 4:55 PM
Share This