ForgotPassword?
Sign Up
Search this Topic:
Forum Jump
Jan 19 10 8:04 PM
Wich2 wrote: Bingo, Grant! And my argument is: Instead of going for the Single or Double of - "Well sure, (Michael Keaton/Tom Cruise/Robert Downey/etc.) looks wrong - but he does his best!" Why not at least aim for the out-of-the-park Homerun of - "Wow, (Arthur Wontner/Chris Reeve/Lynda Carter) not only does their best - they also look perfect!" Too much work, I guess; or too unhiply square... -Craig
Jan 19 10 8:21 PM
Jan 19 10 8:40 PM
Jan 20 10 12:28 AM
Jan 20 10 12:44 AM
Jan 20 10 12:56 AM
tonyrivers wrote: Peter Parker aka Spider-man.
Jan 22 10 12:10 PM
Jan 12 11 6:14 AM
Scathach80 wrote: BijouBob8mm wrote: Not sure if a grittier Spider-Man interests me but I like the down to earth angle. The recent Batman films seem to have used up most of the "gritty." It would be great if the filmmakers aren't overly influenced by the success of the Dark Knight and instead play to Spider-Man's strengths. Agreed. These days, it seems as if "gritty" is used simply for the sake of gritty. (Warners was even talking about giving Superman that approach, for a while.) Kind of like when ALIEN was such a hit; we got lots of sci-fi noir with plenty of grime. (And more than a few monsters looked very Giger-inspired in the years that followed.) If the approach is suitable for the subject, that's fine; just don't try to force every franchise into the same mold. Someone mentioned that Warner Bros, after comparing how Speed Racer did to how The Dark Knight did, wanted the latter approach for Captain Marvel and Shazam. The writer then said "Does Warner Bros. put out the Harry Potter films"?
BijouBob8mm wrote: Not sure if a grittier Spider-Man interests me but I like the down to earth angle. The recent Batman films seem to have used up most of the "gritty." It would be great if the filmmakers aren't overly influenced by the success of the Dark Knight and instead play to Spider-Man's strengths. Agreed. These days, it seems as if "gritty" is used simply for the sake of gritty. (Warners was even talking about giving Superman that approach, for a while.) Kind of like when ALIEN was such a hit; we got lots of sci-fi noir with plenty of grime. (And more than a few monsters looked very Giger-inspired in the years that followed.) If the approach is suitable for the subject, that's fine; just don't try to force every franchise into the same mold.
Not sure if a grittier Spider-Man interests me but I like the down to earth angle. The recent Batman films seem to have used up most of the "gritty." It would be great if the filmmakers aren't overly influenced by the success of the Dark Knight and instead play to Spider-Man's strengths.
Jan 12 11 2:12 PM
It's hilarious reading all the doom and gloom comments about the Spider-man reboot....without knowing anything about the cast, the crew, and see a trailer or something to give us a good idea if the movie is actually really good or really bad.
Jan 13 11 1:28 PM
Jan 13 11 4:42 PM
Jan 13 11 5:01 PM
No studio wants their films to fail.
Many Superman fans were delighted when Bryan Singer was announced as the director of SUPERMAN RETURNS based on his work on the X-MEN films until they saw the revised costume and details about the script.
The time to have concern about a film is when details about it come to light and a trailer gives you an idea about how the film looks, NOT the original news about the project.
Jan 13 11 5:02 PM
Jan 13 11 7:46 PM
Jan 13 11 8:31 PM
Jan 13 11 9:15 PM
"Spidey's lookin' kinda scrawny."
So did Ditko's, Bob!
Well, if this guy can get the P.P. vibe right - which I thought his predecessor really did - we'll see...(Oh, yeah - and if Spidey doesn't turn into a videogame character every time he makes a cool move, even better!)
Jan 14 11 8:20 AM
Jan 14 11 2:42 PM
Jan 14 11 3:07 PM
delgadosaur wrote:I don't likey the new costume. I like that he's skinny and Ditko-like. Can't wait to see that the Lizard looks like. He'd better have a lab coat.
Jan 17 11 12:05 PM
Share This