Sony rebooting Spider-man in Coming Soon Forum

0 Points

Forum Jump

Sony rebooting Spider-man

Author	Comment
HalLane		#241	[-]
Jun 19 12 7:29 AM More My Recent Posts	Well at least this film seems to have a focus. Not necessarily a bad thing. Nothing worse than high energy calisthenics with no clear point of view. Good to hear the 3-D pops.
	Remove this ad
Victor Frankenstein		#242	[-]
Jun 19 12 8:02 AM More My Recent Posts	So....was that review written by a 15 year old girl then?
Wich2		#243	[-]
Jun 19 12 11:00 AM More My Recent Posts	>'Twilight in spandex'< Ugh. (Then again, Lee & Ditko's was kinda 'Dobie Gillis in spandex,' so what the hell!)
delgadosaur		#244	[-]
Jun 19 12 11:10 AM More My Recent Posts	Ugghhhhhhhhhhhhh.
flashback		#245	[-]
Jun 19 12 3:32 PM More My Recent Posts	how many times has a reviewer not gotten what a movie is about?you can`t go by newspaper reviews.
HalLane		#246	[-]
Jun 20 12 8:42 AM More My Recent Posts	So does EVERY American superhero movie open abroad first these days?
Robert Troch		#247	[-]
Jun 20 12 9:47 AM More My Recent Posts	HalLane wrote: So does EVERY American superhero movie open abroad first these days? That seems to the way it has gone. I ll be seeing this but I am not expecting anything spectacular. Robert T.
clore103051		#248	[-]
Jun 20 12 9:51 PM More My Recent Posts	I just won complimentary tickets to see a 3D screening sponsored by Sony on the night before the official premiere. At that price, I'll check it out.
flashback		#249	[-]
Jun 20 12 11:15 PM More My Recent Posts	i plan to see the movie.i have been a fan of spiderman since issue 9 from the very first days in 1964. i liked all 3 of the sam rami`s spiderman movies.i will acknowledge there were some things in the third movie that made it less then it could be.too many villians.the peter parker dancing down the street scene.the parker personality change.but it had a great climatic scene and for the most part it was a good movie. the answer in my opinion is not to start from scratch.it is for to look at the mistakes and correct them.sam should have been still able to direct and toby mcguier should have still been able to continue the role. it is what it is .they rebooted spiderman.i do plan to see it.
Dr Acula		#250	[-]
Jun 26 12 1:57 PM More My Recent Posts	Bleeding Cool posted this - one of those advertisements that come on the bottom of the tv that animate over what you are watching... in this case, an ill-timed ad caused Spiderman to fly out of the pitcher's rear end: My God, what's Bond doing?... I think he's attempting re-entry, sir. http://www.eccentric-cinema.com/ Cole's Comics: All About Jack Cole http://colescomics.blogspot.com/
	Remove this ad
Victor Frankenstein		#251	[-]
Jun 26 12 2:27 PM More My Recent Posts
Badfinger		#252	[-]
Jun 26 12 2:44 PM More My Recent Posts	Wich2 wrote: >toby mcguire did a god job of showing just enough angst for parker.< Agreed, Flash. >Spidey always drove the villains nuts with his wisecracking and teasing. I have yet to see that aspect done well.< Robert, I wonder if that isn't one of those things that works in a comic, but on film might fall into TV Batman camp? Also, "comic time," where you can say whole sentences while punching and being punched (or if it's by Roy Thomas, whole paragraphs!) is not the same as "live-action time.' This ^. That being said, there were still some typical Spidey wisecracks.
Rick		#253	[-]
Jun 26 12 2:48 PM More My Recent Posts	I think, as I joked in another thread, that I actually am all super-heroed out. I still haven't seen THE AVENGERS, and can't muster much interest in it. I saw a SPIDER-MAN trailer and really didn't care. Even THE DARK KNIGHT RISES, which ordinarily would be pretty enticing to me -- I just saw a commercial for it, and stopped looking before it was even over. I know I'll see all of 'em eventually, but only because I see everything eventually. But I surprise even myself with my total lack of interest in any of them.
Wich2		#254	[-]
Jun 26 12 3:20 PM More My Recent Posts	>toby mcguier should have still been able to continue the role< Toby's too long in the tooth for your friendly neighborhood spiderteen.
delgadosaur		#255	[-]
Jun 26 12 4:12 PM More My Recent Posts	I'm gonna go with a completely skeptical eye here. Spidey's my favorite superhero.
Andy Sheets		#256	[-]
Jun 26 12 4:17 PM More My Recent Posts	Wasn't Maguire developing some pretty serious back problems, too? I seem to recall some ongoing concerns about how much physical activity he could take while making the movies because of that.
delgadosaur		#257	[-]
Jun 27 12 11:34 AM More My Recent Posts	I thought the second film was the best of an interpretation of my favorite superhero, and just HATED the third film. The guy that played Jolly Jonah was great, but the rest, nah.
HalLane		#258	[-]
Jun 27 12 12:49 PM More My Recent Posts	Agreed about 2 & 3, and about old man Toby too. That's why this reboot makes sense to me. Gwen Stacy was my era, and Emma Stone seems just perfect (well, Betty Brant was actually my era, but let's not get ridiculous about it.) And if a new Oscorp building means a new Goblin might be in the cards, it's only gonna get better.
Victor Frankenstein		#259	[-]
Jun 27 12 1:16 PM More My Recent Posts	Curious since the word is that there wasn't enough time to add a planned Oscorp building to The Avengers, if they might have a Stark Enterprises/Avengers building in the skyline in this film...
flashback		#260	[-]
Jun 27 12 10:48 PM More My Recent Posts	Wich2 wrote: >toby mcguier should have still been able to continue the role< Toby's too long in the tooth for your friendly neighborhood spiderteen. in the comics peter parker aged past a teen.why can`t the actor age the role in a movie series? you make it sound like toby mcguire is ready for the old folks home. Last Edited By: flashback Jun 27 12 10:51 PM. Edited 1 times.
	Remove this ad

<< Previous Topic Next Topic >>

Yuku free message boards

Sony rebooting Spider-man