ForgotPassword?
Sign Up
Search this Topic:
Forum Jump
Jan 25 11 4:34 PM
Jan 25 11 6:44 PM
BijouBob8mm wrote: In my opinion any combative type of adventure-character who wears a distinctive costume is at least within a "superhero idiom," even though we'll never get rid of the association that "superhero" means "super powers."I think Batman is a perfect example of a costumed crimefighter without super powers who qualifies as a superhero. But I think what a character is, or isn't, should depend upon intent rather than merely wardrobe. (A guy wearing a mask to disguise his identity while he robs a bank isn't necessarily a super villain.) Zorro was created as a mystery man of the West. Other characters who, like Zorro, started life in the pulps would be Tarzan and Conan, but I don't feel either of them qualify as superhero either...minimalistic costuming issues aside. (And then there's the Shadow, who started out as merely a host for thrillers, not as an actual participant in them.)In terms of marketing, if most fans of Zorro and the Lone Ranger are going to look for these under Westerns, I'd place the product where the majority will be searching. Since the Zorro series was promoted as Mainstream and didn't fare well among the masses, putting it in such a niche like Sci-Fi might have hurt sales even more. And there are a lot of Western fans who wouldn't be caught dead in the Sci-Fi section, as they prefer their entertainment to be more "earthy." (By the same token, I know some Sci-Fi and horror fans who have no use for "oaters" at all.) I remember getting the car worked on years ago. I'm in the waiting area, watching TV, and VALLEY OF GWANGI is in progress. There are a few other customers waiting and watching as well. Suddenly the first dinosaur comes on and one guy blurts out, "What the hell is this mess?" It was like watching the film get the MST3K treatment from that point on.You know, the Hornet may be unique in that his sidekick is probably the more devestating half of the team...have we ever seen that before (or since)?
In my opinion any combative type of adventure-character who wears a distinctive costume is at least within a "superhero idiom," even though we'll never get rid of the association that "superhero" means "super powers."
NATURALISTIC! UNCANNY! MARVELOUS!
Jan 25 11 8:44 PM
Jan 26 11 5:48 PM
Jan 28 11 11:01 AM
Feb 4 11 7:59 AM
Feb 7 11 11:38 PM
Feb 7 11 11:57 PM
thehorrorboy wrote: In THE GLOBE, one of those trashy supermarket tabloids that many people read (or, at least, flip though in the checkout line) but few will admit to reading, TV Hornet Van Williams said he was "pretty upset" about the film.
Feb 8 11 1:43 PM
Feb 8 11 5:43 PM
Mar 4 11 8:02 PM
Carl Eyesnheart wrote:The film isn't the disaster some would want it to be. This isn't GODZILLA '98 territory, and a follow up film could very easily turn into a respectable Green Hornet film. The makings are there. If you were a 20 something year old, rich as all get out guy, suddenly in the drivers seat of your life with no authority around you, there is a very good chance you would be the type of guy who Brit is in the film. Not everybody was exceedingly mature and wise at the age of 25.
Mar 4 11 11:43 PM
Apr 26 11 5:23 PM
thib wrote:Hello.Monochromes brother here - I came over to defend my statement on Green Hornet and comic books. Well, maybe I can't defend it as it was technically wrong. As a couple of you pointed out GH has been featured in some comic books, the most successful of which was a 47 issue golden age run under the now defunct publisher Harvey (later famous for Casper, Richie, Rich, Spooky, etc). I'm actually surprised I never noticed that run before. There were some cool covers in there......Anyway, what I meant was that the Green Hornet is not an original comic book character or claimed as such by comic book fans. Yes, he was featured in a comic - but Star Wars, Zorro, Gene Autry and Donald Duck have had longer, more successful comic book runs than GH and no one gets confused about thier "origins" - probably because they don't feature super heroes.
May 8 11 9:15 PM
May 8 11 9:42 PM
Robotrix wrote: I don't know which was worse - this movie or Rogan invading that episode of "Mythbusters" where they proved that every single thing in the movie couldn't be done (blowing the backhoe off the Black Beauty and them surviving being buried, cutting it with the elevator, etc)....And then Rogan smirking into the camera (paraphrasing), "Just shows you you have to throw out physics if you're going to make a great movie."To which I ask, "And when have you ever made a great movie?"
Jun 20 11 3:17 PM
Jun 20 11 4:04 PM
Jun 26 11 4:18 PM
Jun 27 11 2:01 PM
Carl Eyesnheart wrote: I don't give a rats patootie about box office returns. That's no way of judging quality. Britney Spears out sells The Riverboat Gamblers, but I will take the Gamblers any day of the week over Britney.
Aug 14 11 7:44 AM
thib wrote:Anyway, what I meant was that the Green Hornet is not an original comic book character or claimed as such by comic book fans. Yes, he was featured in a comic - but Star Wars......have had longer, more successful comic book runs than GH and no one gets confused about thier "origins" - probably because they don't feature super heroes.
Share This