ForgotPassword?
Sign Up
Search this Topic:
Forum Jump
Feb 12 12 7:40 PM
NATURALISTIC! UNCANNY! MARVELOUS!
Feb 12 12 8:36 PM
Apr 3 12 5:20 PM
Siouxsie Sue wrote:Holmes crappping himself at sight of the hound was overcooked in the extreme -- part of this series' intention to more fully humanise him, but just not very effectively.
Apr 4 12 7:10 AM
Apr 9 12 4:25 AM
Apr 9 12 12:55 PM
cjh5801 wrote:If I were Sherlock, this is how I'd fake my death (highlight for spoilers):I'd arrange for Moriarty to meet me on the roof. I'd have Watson lured away by a phone call (maybe from Molly). I'd have Molly and the irregulars (the ones he called the homeless) help me stage a plummet from the rooftop onto an airbag (perhaps hidden in a covered opening in the sidewalk). When Watson came back, I'd arrange to have him knocked down by a bicyclist so he'd be delayed and disoriented. I'd have the irregulars hide the airbag (by replacing the cover on the sidewalk?) and help make me up to look all bloody. I'd have the irregulars keep Watson from my body. I'd have Molly help switch me with another dead body (Moriarty?).That's what I'd do.
Apr 15 12 7:34 PM
May 6 12 10:21 PM
May 7 12 7:06 AM
May 7 12 10:47 AM
I actually liked it. Though...
SPOILERS - BEWARE!!!- They darkened Irene a bit too much for me. Her profession didn't bother me; but the trafficking with Moriarty and Terrorists did.- Clore, I think the ending (intentionally?) could be read two ways: 1. Sherl saved Irene2. Irene fantasized about Sherl in her last moments
May 7 12 12:02 PM
I think the ending (intentionally?) could be read two ways: 1. Sherl saved Irene2. Irene fantasized about Sherl in her last moments
May 7 12 1:43 PM
May 7 12 4:11 PM
May 7 12 4:24 PM
May 7 12 5:51 PM
May 7 12 6:22 PM
May 7 12 6:40 PM
May 7 12 7:43 PM
Again, flash, I hear you. But that's just the point:
This writing/producing team has made brilliant - genuinely brilliant - "plug ins" of Now things for Then things.
May 7 12 9:07 PM
May 7 12 9:58 PM
Charles, I see, and largely agree with, your main point. But -
>the dusty realm of historical fiction the perceived baggage the nostalgia any idealized notion of the past a piece of the past, befogged by nostalgia<All such limiting malarky is the fault of lenses that later readers choose to put on, not of the original author or his material. Good is Good, and always "new" in a sense to each new reader, or listener, or watcher. Nothing forces anyone to see the book of Genesis, the play of Hamlet, the film of Nosferatu, or anything else as quaint, outdated, or of smaller stature. >not a reimagining or reinvention. This is the real deal.<I think it is very much the real deal. And no, not so much a "reimagining" - because that involves core meanings, which the new company has honored effectively indeed. But there is of necessity a little reinvention, because people (both real and fictional) are intrinsically creatures of their times; and changing the setting does affect the perception of the gem.-Craig
Share This