If I could save JUST ONE film from a burning warehouse... in Classic Horror Polls Forum

0 Points

New Poll

<< Previous Topic Next Topic >>

If I could save JUST ONE film from a burning warehouse...

Author	Comment
TomWeaver999		#21	[-]
Oct 16 10 4:57 PM Reply Quote More My Recent Posts	<< I have always been intrigued by THE MONKEY'S PAW (1933). << Ummmm....that's in a different warehouse (which is not burning). I marked the box with Magic Marker, and I made one of the workers there aware of it (I believe his name was Hector, he was washing the windows), and I fully expect a release by 2038. Prove us wrong!
	Remove this ad
stuthehistoryguy		#22	[-]
Jan 18 11 9:06 AM Reply Quote More My Recent Posts	PhantomXCI wrote: atenolol wrote: "No one has actually seen it, right." There is at least one review at IMDB written by a very old gentleman who saw it back in 1933. The review was written about ten years ago. And it WASN'T written by McIntyre, so it might just be true. A fragment of the film (I believe it only runs about a minute or two) exists at UCLA. Sadly, that's all we've got. Can Joe Average get a look at it in some form (e.g., has it been scanned digitally)? Or is it a sacred object enshrined in the Holy of Holies away from profane eyes? LAM was probably a below-average 20s horror movie, whereas the spider sequence is part of a strikingly important film that had influenced generations. If I were a film scholar, I would choose the spider sequence in a heartbeat. But I'm a vampire scholar. At least that's what the websites all say. So my vote goes to LAM.
rvoyttbots		#23	[-]
Aug 26 12 7:29 PM Reply Quote More My Recent Posts	Spider pit. I`d rather watch a movie with real monsters, not one with a phony baloney one.
SparkieGojira		#24	[-]
Mar 9 13 6:55 AM Reply Quote More My Recent Posts	I went with the Spider sequence only 'cause I figure there is a better chance of a complete film turning up safe and sound somewhere someday. -Clark

<< Previous Topic Next Topic >>

Add Reply