ForgotPassword?
Sign Up
Search this Topic:
Forum Jump
May 29 07 6:08 PM
May 29 07 6:14 PM
Quote:Let's look at Ms. Howe's defense. She calls her accuser names, and then cites her own fake reports as evidence. Lamer and lamer. There's nothing like an ad hominem attack to arouse suspicion. Notice how she first calls the man a thief and liar, without any supporting evidence, and then implies that she's above suspicion because of her (regional, whatever they are) Emmys. A classic dodge.
May 29 07 11:13 PM
May 30 07 10:10 AM
Quote:why do guys like you look at her entire career and track record and pick out one "blemish" while ignoring the credible? Don't any of her credentials and accomplishments count for anything? Apparently not in your eyes. It's like saying a doctor has treated 999 patients successfully and lost one and then screaming.."see...he's no good...malpractice"
May 30 07 10:39 AM
May 30 07 11:37 AM
May 30 07 11:39 AM
Quote:You can't just pull up a photo online, look at it and say "Photoshop/fake" without any evidence of same-(Bill,Monsterpal...where's YOUR evidence of fakery or Photoshop? Prove to me with scientific method that all these photos are fakes)... any more than "Chad" or whoever can say "Real photos" without solid evidence to back himself.
May 30 07 11:42 AM
May 30 07 11:47 AM
May 30 07 11:55 AM
Quote:You seem to be agreeing here that this is indeed a "blemish" on Linda's career. That strikes me as an admission that she acted irresponsibly, if not dishonestly. I found those three sites in about five minutes. Imagine what a thorough search could turn up.
May 30 07 11:56 AM
May 30 07 11:59 AM
May 30 07 12:09 PM
May 30 07 12:59 PM
Quote: It's up to him to prove it's real, and not up to me to prove it's fake.
May 30 07 1:02 PM
May 30 07 1:09 PM
Quote:you know ultimately it doesn't matter to me at all what you guys think.
May 30 07 1:57 PM
May 30 07 4:57 PM
May 30 07 5:23 PM
Share This