Weirdest UFO pics I've ever seen... in Off Topic Discussions Forum

0 Points

Forum Jump

Weirdest UFO pics I've ever seen...

Author	Comment
BelaTheWolf	Re: Anally retentive	#221	[-]
Jun 2 07 7:29 AM Reply Quote More My Recent Posts	Toilet paper. What a rip off!
	Remove this ad
luluthebeast	Re: re:UFO pics	#222	[-]
Jun 2 07 9:15 AM Reply Quote More My Recent Posts	You know, I could explain all of this UFO stuff to you, but Lord Kinbote would probably have me executed!
Ted Newsom	Re: Weirdest UFO pics I've ever seen...	#223	[-]
Jun 2 07 9:51 AM Reply Quote More My Recent Posts	Some people have probing views on religion.
Monsterpal	Re: Weirdest UFO pics I've ever seen...	#224	[-]
Jun 2 07 12:13 PM Reply Quote More My Recent Posts	The Red Sox are doing well this season, but only because several of their players have been probed.
Plastic Sam	Re: Weirdest UFO pics I've ever seen...	#225	[-]
Jun 2 07 5:57 PM Reply Quote More My Recent Posts	How 'bout them anal probes?
Monsterpal	Re: Weirdest UFO pics I've ever seen...	#226	[-]
Jun 2 07 6:25 PM Reply Quote More My Recent Posts	The Probes are having a tremendous season.
porta	ufo	#227	[-]
Jun 12 07 4:39 PM Reply Quote More My Recent Posts	so is this thing real or not?
Monsterpal	Re: ufo	#228	[-]
Jun 12 07 5:21 PM Reply Quote More My Recent Posts	That's a probing question, Porta.
luluthebeast	Re: ufo	#229	[-]
Jun 12 07 6:44 PM Reply Quote More My Recent Posts	Maybe it's a proto-type for a new penis-enlarger.
rvoyttbots	Re: ufo	#230	[-]
Jun 12 07 6:46 PM Reply Quote More My Recent Posts	LOL
	Remove this ad
Monsterpal	Re: ufo	#231	[-]
Jun 12 07 9:02 PM Reply Quote More My Recent Posts	The Rectal Speculum From Beyond the Stars!
gugon	Re: ufo	#232	[-]
Jun 13 07 7:57 AM Reply Quote More My Recent Posts	For what it's worth, I read Linda Moulten Howe's book Alien Harvest and I was impressed by the evidence and by her relative impartiality toward the subject. She did link animal mutilations to UFO's and / or government conspiracies as possible explanations - but she didn't push those explanations. Mainly she presented the evidence and left the interpretation fairly open. Do I believe in UFO's? Yes. Do I believe they are visitors from space? No. Like many of us here, when I was younger I believed all of it. Every report I read. But with age I have become much more skeptical (or scientifically minded?). Unless there's proof, nothing is proven. And for any given bit of evidence, there are multiple potential explanations. But I'm at the point now where it doesn't really matter. The thing is, we do have more than enough evidence to say that SOMETHING weird is definitely going on. Even in our age of enlightenment, there still many mysteries out there. For me it's not about the solution - it's about the mystery. That's what I love, and I suspect that's what many others love as well. We need mystery in the world. Without it, we are left that chilling question, "Is this all there is?" No one can deny that there is still strangeness in the world. There are still things we can't explain. That's enough for me.
Bill Warren	Re: ufo	#233	[-]
Jun 13 07 3:26 PM Reply Quote More My Recent Posts	A friend of mine once pointed out, probably accurately, that if the Loch Ness Monster was real and was caught and put on display in a zoo, it soon would be just another critter in a zoo, interesting perhaps, but not a wonder.
Monsterpal	Re: ufo	#234	[-]
Jun 18 07 10:00 PM Reply Quote More My Recent Posts	And putting Nessie in a zoo would ruin the economy around Loch Ness. Would you want to do that to those good Scottish folks, I ask you?
Squashpants	Re: ufo	#235	[-]
Jun 29 07 6:22 AM Reply Quote More My Recent Posts	Hello, again, Charles. Thought you might want the link to the latest development in the saga of the weirdest UFO photos ever seen. isaaccaret.fortunecity.com/ "No! You stay here. Look out for more zombies..."
Charles Thaxton	Re: ufo	#236	[-]
Jun 29 07 10:00 AM Reply Quote More My Recent Posts	yeah...I've been following it. Just didn't wanna post it and get into the debate again. Let everyone do their own homework.
Ted Newsom	Re: ufo	#237	[-]
Jul 1 07 12:39 AM Reply Quote More My Recent Posts	If the letter and the accompanyng photographs (linked above) is a hoax, it is one of the most sophisticated and pointless ones I've ever seen. I can see a LOT of UFO buffs getting very angry that the anonymous author throws away such cherished notions as abductions (and presumably anal probes), interstellar warfare, space babes, visits to Venus to meet Jesus, etc. The photo images of the alien hardware are fascinating. Could these things be created by a clever jamoke with a computer and a lot of time on his hands? Yes. Could the same person (or his good-looking blonde confederate, who moonlights as a topless dancer. I can only dream.) have created not only a visually-plausible alien "language," but also spin a yarn wherein symbols themselves have power (a concept not dissimilar to ancient magickal thought)? Yes, but again, he (and his girlfriend, who I'd like to meet one of these evenings) would have to have a lot of time on his hands. And comp'ing up assorted pages from a quasi-official text primer on alien artifacts and creating a plausible construct as he does-- could you fake it? Yes, but the same counter-arguement could be made-- why? For fun? To fool the world or pull its leg? Maybe to establish one's own branch of UFOlogy? (And what exactly are the benefits of THAT?) I don't know. I'm impressed.
Jojo Lapin X	Re: ufo	#238	[-]
Jul 1 07 7:58 AM Reply Quote More My Recent Posts	*Quote:* why? For fun? For fun and profit, I would imagine. Those pages have quite a lot of advertising on them.
Ted Newsom	Re: ufo	#239	[-]
Jul 1 07 10:37 AM Reply Quote More My Recent Posts	Jojo, I'm not referring to the early "appearances" of the flying eggbeater photos, which are on semi-commerical public boards (which. like CHFB, or network TV, or newspapers, need some sort of income to remain alive). I'm referring to the latest-- and longest-- link, which has no ads whatsoever nor any links to any for-profit site, nor any understandable motive for a hoax. It is an extremely intricate, well-written first-hand account of involvement in a believable quasi-government black-ops project, complete with numerous photo reproductions of what does appear to be an official instruction manual c. 1985, and numerous photos of high-tech artifacts which do appear to be intricate and advanced devices... of some sort. Now, one thing which does make me slightly suspect is the method of telling the story-- which is exactly what I'd do if I was telling a wild yarn, and exactly what Poe, Lovecraft and Doyle and who knows how many others have done, including the guys who did TEXAS CHAINSAW MASSACRE, BLAIR WITCH PROJECT, etc. You start slowly, give the reader a disclaimer to the effect that "I have no reason to lie about this. If I heard this story, I wouldn't believe it either. But it happened. I know it's true... because it happened to me." And at that point you can pretty much tell someone anything. If it is a hoax, it is far better and more complex than the blue-bound supposed USAF-printed manuscrrript on motherships and anti-grav stuff which circulated about 15 years ago... and the motivations for creating such a "hoax" are certainly more obscure than the obvious ones of the bogus "MJ-12 papers" from 20 years ago (in that case, the forged papers "backed up" the authors' claims of government conspiracies & the crash at Roswell.) Another thing that bothers me is how nicely some of the set-up fits snugly into existing UFO mythology. The "instruction manual" refers only vaguely to crashed alien craft and recovered unusual technology (as such a manual would, given the parameters of the alleged job at hand). "Reverse designing" has long been part of the UFO mythos (hey, essentially that's straight out of EARTH VS. THE FLYING SAUCERS). But for all that, there is clear intelligence and versimilitude to the narrative, believable motivations to the people and organizations the author discusses, and accompanying material that seems to back up the limited-scope fantastic tale. There are no claims of messianic revelations, no ominous Men in Black, no bovine anal probes, no jaunts to the Moon with space babes. If it is an elaborate hoax, they have my great admiration. If it is real, it's revelatory.
JimPV	Re: ufo	#240	[-]
Jul 1 07 10:56 AM Reply Quote More My Recent Posts	*Quote:* ...if the Loch Ness Monster was real and was caught and put on display in a zoo, it soon would be just another critter in a zoo, interesting perhaps, but not a wonder. Yeah, absolutely. Alligators, coelacanths and komodo dragons (I believe) are literally living dinosaurs and, while interesting, they certainly don't engender in us the same feelings as when we think of the "loch Ness monster". If Nessie did turn out to be a once-thought-extinct critter, we'd eventually just think, "huh, everybody thought those were long gone but guess they were wrong." *Quote:* ...no jaunts to the Moon with space babes. Yeah, and it's a damn shame...! "How many cares one loses when one decides not to be something but to be someone" -Coco Chanel
	Remove this ad

<< Previous Topic Next Topic >>

Add Reply

Yuku free message boards

Weirdest UFO pics I've ever seen...