page 43 to 44

Spencer is now shown the official autopsy photographs

Gunn--Ms Spencer, could you go to the light box and tell me is you can identify the color transparency of view #1 and image #29, as having seen that before?
Spencer--No.
Gunn--In what respect is the image #29 different from what you previously saw?
Spencer--Like I said, there was none of the blood or matted hair.

page 48-49

Gunn--Ms Spencer, have you had the opportunity to look at the second view corresponding to color numbers 26, 27, and 28.
Spencer--Yes, I have.
Gunn--Do those two images correspond to the photographs that you developed at NPC in November of 1963.
Spencer--No.
Gunn--In what way are they different?
Spencer--There was no--the film that I seen or the prints that we printed did not have the massive head damages that is visible here.
Gunn--Putting aside the question of the damage to the head, does the remainder of the body, the face, correspond to what you observed?
Spencer--No.
Gunn--In what way is it different?
Spencer--The face in the photographs that we did, did not have the stress that these photos--on the face that these photos show.
Gunn--Could you describe a little more what you mean by that?
Spencer--The face, the eyes were closed and the face, the mouth was closed, and it was more in a rest position than these show.

page 50

Gunn--So, just to be sure that I am understanding correctly, previously, in you deposition, you described a wound, a small, circular wound in the back of the head, approximately two inches or so as I recall that you stated, whereas, these show a much larger injury, is that correct?
Spencer--That is correct.

Last Edited By: atenolol Dec 1 13 12:49 PM. Edited 1 times.