"You're maintaining the Zapruder film has been altered?"

No. I'm not into speculation any more. I am just pointing out that there are conflicts within the primary sources. I will let others do the speculating and draw the conclusions.

"Atenolol, you raise some excellent questions."

I think the primary sources raise them.

**Each time this issue is raised I do a bit of research and each time I am more struck by how almost every "answer" raises more questions than it answers.

For example, I just came across yesterday the testimony of a naval officer, Saundra Kay Spencer, who in November of 1963 was asked by a Secret Service agent, James Fox, to develop photos of President Kennedy's corpse. For all sorts of reasons--she apparently kept careful logs--she denied the photos we have of the autopsy are the ones she developed in testimony before the ARRB in 1997. There is no doubt that the chain of possession of the autopsy photos went through her, as far as I can learn.

below are excerpts from her testimony--