Latarnia wrote:
GaryP11111 wrote:
Latarnia wrote:
GaryP11111 wrote:
 Among the transgressions noted was the singular word "experimenting" and the phrase "became a full-time cameraman".

The posts have been deleted, but I don't see either of the above examples in the comparisons.  I do have accurate examples of the transgressions, which are not as obviously non-problematic, even ridiculous, as the above.


Mirek



Really? They were highlighted in red in YOUR "Let's go to the video" post.

Which was a copy of the original post on the matter.  Both deleted now.   But though both posts are gone, I'm sure that the two examples offered by you were not just stand-alones, but part of something more tangible.  Nevertheless, since then, I have done comparisons myself, and in my examples neither of those two mentions come up.


Mirek



As I wrote earlier those rather innocuous instances (which you highlighted) of sameness along with the other examples were inconclusive. They are inconclusive, not in their sameness, but in the bottom line (once again) that we simply don't know if one was borrowed from the earlier work or if both writers were using the same source. I looked at the evidence, found it dismally lacking, was given a smidge of information that had some bearing on the matter, made a decision, listened to the appeals and here we are. I'm not feeling much in the way of regret.



GARY L. PRANGE
I'm not all bad, just mostly.

"Sic gorgiamus allos subjectos nunc."