Gary, I gotta say, that's kinda weird. While I think most of us agreed (no, I don't pretend to speak for EVERYone here) that this was probably a case of using the same notes provided by the publicity department (sure looked that way), I see no reason for you all to have deleted everything. Through a third party, I know the writer was informed of the questions raised in this thread. I really would have thought that person would have eventually stopped by and told us what was up with it. Then we could let it stand as one of two things - another example of plagiarism - or (more probably) an example of how to tell the difference.

I'm really sorry this information was deleted
.

Jessie Lilley
Editor-In-Chief, Mondo Cult