The individual in question hasn't posted in the CHFB since March 22, 2013. I have a problem with allowing someone's reputation to be tarnished on weak tea while waiting for additional "clarification" to satisfy the curious or concerned. We have also received information from a third party that tipped the scales in favor of discretion. I feel strongly enough about this that allowing the individual's name to be brought up in conjunction with the allegation or how management of this forum has chosen to handle this matter seems equally wrong. This forum has not received any threats of legal action, but rather has taken this action in the interest of fair play. Please feel free to criticize the direction I have taken this issue. However, any additional posts that mention the individual's name will be deleted.



GARY L. PRANGE
I'm not all bad, just mostly.

"Sic gorgiamus allos subjectos nunc."