Rakshasa wrote:
jamesenstein31 wrote:
This gets more and more pathetic.


This overly obsessive witch hunt of a thread? Yes, agreed 100%. Pretty pathetic indeed.
Hmmmm...Don't know if I would call this a "witch hunt."  Yes, I agree that some have taken it to the extreme, perhaps not here, but on other sites, even bringing in her boyfriend and there has been some really bad name calling too.  That's over the top.

But for others, myself included, I want to know the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.  I don't think it is going to far to uncover all her dirty deeds.  Should it have ended with the 1st discovery?  After 2 or 3?  After 10?  Now this is no Watergate, but certainly there were those who said at the time that Woodward and Bernstein were barking up the wrong tree and should have let it die with the break in. 

Ms. Spiderbaby was making a name for herself in journalism.  She wrote articles, had a website, and pushed to win awards such as the Rondo, which many of us here vote on, but that work wasn't her own.  She won for best Multi-Media, which had plagiarized pieces in her videos.  If someone didn't dig a little deeper, that would have never come out.  David said on page 1 that he felt that wasn't in danger and was ready to move on, but someone did some digging and the dirty truth came out.  Last I heard from David in this thread it sounded like he might be changing his thinking on the Rondo. 

What constitutes a witch hunt & what constitutes digging for the truth?