Yuku free message boards
Username or E-mail:
Password:
Forgot
Password?
Sign Up
Grab the Yuku app
Search:
Classic Horror Film Board
>
Golden Age Horror
>
Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde (1931) revisited
0 Points
Search this Topic:
Remove this ad
«Prev
1
2
3
4
5
…
8
9
Next»
Jump
Add Reply
Forum Jump
Welcome to the CHFB
Forum Guidelines
CHFB TURNS 20!
Rondo Hatton Classic Horror Awards
Universal Horrors
The Universal Monsters Blu-Ray Collection
Golden Age Horror
Kong - 8th Wonder of the World
Silent Horror
Poverty Row
The World of Sherlock Holmes
Murder and Mystery
Thrills and Chills
'50s Horror and Sci-Fi
'60s Horror and Sci-Fi
'70s Horror and Sci-Fi
Hammer Horror
The Psycho Ward
Foreign Horror
Japanese Giants
Horror and Sci-Fi of Recent Decades
Current Films
Second Takes on Films of the 2000s
Independent Films and Documentaries
Coming Soon
TV Terrors
Classic Horror on DVD, Blu-Ray and Streaming
Stream and Stream Again
Horror Film Books and Magazines
Horror by Candlelight
Horror Comics and Fantasy Art
Monster Toys and Collectibles
Classic Horror Movie Memorabilia
Horror Music
Old Time Radio and Audio Horror
Classic Horror Online
CHFB Member Reviews
Our Favorite Horror Hosts
Classic Disney Scares
Horror Film Stars
Men Behind the Monsters
Monster Kid Memories
General Horror and Sci-Fi
Horror Tech
Movie of the Day
Off Topic Discussions
Classic Horror News and Events
Birthdays and Holidays
DVR / TiVo Alert
Final Farewells
Classic Horror Polls
Classic Horror Classifieds
Monster Kids Helping Monster Kids
<< Previous Topic
Next Topic >>
Re: Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde (1931) revisited
Author
Comment
telegonus
A Matter Of Taste
#1
[-]
Oct 7 10 5:09 AM
Reply
Quote
More
My Recent Posts
Truly, Jack, as with most things in life, it all comes down to a matter of taste. The qualitative differences between the two American sound versions of
Jekyll and Hyde
can never be resolved to the satisfaction of everybody. My problems with the Mamoulian are similar to yours, but it's not so much that I don't like the film (I do) but that I find the 1941 version more powerful despite its being post-Code and, yes, sanitized.
A few of my reasons for preferring the Fleming J&H:
Production values: Superior in every way. A larger than life late Victorian London that blows me away every time I watch the film. Leaving aside the story: the Fleming is a stunner just to look at. The Mamoulian, while skillfully made, feels cramped, almost like a B (which it obviously isn't) by comparison.
Action: The later version gets around more, features more people in movement, shows how they move, where they go. One of its great set pieces, in which Hyde knocks a fellow's hat off in the tavern with his cane, then all hell breaks loose, for some reason, for me, is more frightening than anything in the 1931 J&H, including March in extreme Hyde mode.
Psychology: Psychological sadism is emphasized in the Fleming picture far more than horror, is ramped up to a degree of such intensity as to make it feel downright spooky, which satisfies this horror fan. It's another way of getting the job done. To rephrase the matter: there's a level of emotional danger, emotional cruelty, of horror and fear as it relates to human relationships in the 1941 picture, while the earlier film is not much more than a well made horror, which is nothing to sneeze at.
Zeitgeist
: The Mamoulian is a product of the early Depression era, was made at a time when Hoover was still in the White House and before Hitler came to power. It reflects that troubled time (all movies reflected their times), and maybe because of that feels somewhat small, maybe not literally made on the cheap, it was definitely made on a budget, and it was not a lavish one. Come 1941, the economy is rebounding, the world is at war even as the U.S. is still neutral. Different times, different issues. The Production Code is firmly in place, so the sexier aspects that the earlier film could indulge in had to be toned down. On the other hand, the psychological aspects could be ramped up. I wouldn't go so far as to say that Tracy's Hyde in any way literally reflected Hitler, Stalin or Mussolini, yet he and the power held over others resonated very differently from the more purely personal power that March's Hyde asserted. The 1931 picture seems to be dealing with matters in a highly particular, often skilled and sophisticated manner, while the 1941 is broader, in scope and feeling, larger than life, seems to touch on larger issues, and some of those issues make me shudder. Mamoulian's picture is a very good show.
<< Previous Topic
Next Topic >>
Add Reply
Forum Jump
Welcome to the CHFB
Forum Guidelines
CHFB TURNS 20!
Rondo Hatton Classic Horror Awards
Universal Horrors
The Universal Monsters Blu-Ray Collection
Golden Age Horror
Kong - 8th Wonder of the World
Silent Horror
Poverty Row
The World of Sherlock Holmes
Murder and Mystery
Thrills and Chills
'50s Horror and Sci-Fi
'60s Horror and Sci-Fi
'70s Horror and Sci-Fi
Hammer Horror
The Psycho Ward
Foreign Horror
Japanese Giants
Horror and Sci-Fi of Recent Decades
Current Films
Second Takes on Films of the 2000s
Independent Films and Documentaries
Coming Soon
TV Terrors
Classic Horror on DVD, Blu-Ray and Streaming
Stream and Stream Again
Horror Film Books and Magazines
Horror by Candlelight
Horror Comics and Fantasy Art
Monster Toys and Collectibles
Classic Horror Movie Memorabilia
Horror Music
Old Time Radio and Audio Horror
Classic Horror Online
CHFB Member Reviews
Our Favorite Horror Hosts
Classic Disney Scares
Horror Film Stars
Men Behind the Monsters
Monster Kid Memories
General Horror and Sci-Fi
Horror Tech
Movie of the Day
Off Topic Discussions
Classic Horror News and Events
Birthdays and Holidays
DVR / TiVo Alert
Final Farewells
Classic Horror Polls
Classic Horror Classifieds
Monster Kids Helping Monster Kids
Share This
Email to Friend
del.icio.us
Digg it
Facebook
Blogger
Yahoo MyWeb
«Prev
1
2
3
4
5
…
8
9
Next»
Jump
Classic Horror Film Board
>
Golden Age Horror
>
Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde (1931) revisited
Click to subscribe by RSS
Click to receive E-mail notifications of replies