Cadaverino wrote:
If it were in a court today, Lichtenstein would probably win with a "fair use" defense. Courts today look on such a use in fine art as transformative rather than derivative. Blanch v. Koons, 467 F. 3d 244 (C.A.2, 2006).
"Don't muck with the Fouse." -- Harlan Ellison (by way of the Rev. Wm. Spooner)


www.SnokieStories.com
www.BuzzDixon.com
http://twitter.com/snokiestories