As I posted above, that's self-evident. But, that's why we have scholars and books of facts -- to enlighten us. But, I believe the people who made the film (on this occasion, the director) would know the intention of what they were making better than any third-party. We're talking Monsta Movies, not surrealist art. And, if I have to respect others "interpretations," they should respect my belief in the word of the director, himself. No?

One last time... I present the facts (from verified sources, publications, and the mouths of the men who made the films); what you do with those facts is up to you. Don't shoot the messenger. You don't have to like what I post because it challenges you in some way that makes you feel diminished or threatened, that's your problem, not mine. Of course, if you want to interpret something because of your own political, life or other views (strengths or shortcomings), that's up to you. Even in light of such facts, you are welcome to pursue your interpretations and views, but that still doesn't negate the facts, and vice versa. But, to ignore the facts in spite of your personal views is...

Last Edited By: Hachigatsu May 19 10 12:39 AM. Edited 1 times.