Mongo wrote:

AWIL was a Werewolf spoof, and a bloody gory one at that. There was nothing scary about it. It was just plain disgusting. I was waiting for a Wolf-Man and got a big rabid wolf/dog that you didn't even see until the very end of the picture. A RIP OFF.

Don't tell me you think the 1941 Wolf Man was scary? Or Hammer's Curse of the Werewolf?

Out of interest, what werewolf movies are scary to you?

And why were you 'waiting for a wolf-man'? Didn't the image on the poster give it away?image. The movie was not called 'An American Wolfman In London'.

AWIL went back to the original ideas of an actual wolf transformation. A 'wolf-man' is not the be all and end all of werewolf folklore. I wish some people would realise that and stop complaining "he wasn't a wolf man". Thats such an inane point. Wolf-men hybrids didn't come into popular culture until the 20th century. The werewolf 'true wolf creature' is the original interpretation of the legends.

I was pleased AWIL got away from the cliched 'wolf-man' of the 20th century and got back to the classic werewolf 'wolf creature' of old lore. We already had lots of 'wolfman' type movies down the years. AWIL was a fresh and different approach and the werewolf in it was easily the best interpretation of a werewolf thus put on film .

Last Edited By: CarcharodonKong Aug 17 08 3:59 AM. Edited 2 times.