Joe Karlosi wrote:
Jeffrey Allen Rydell wrote:
Joe Karlosi wrote:
Just goes to show that the whole framing issue is never an exact science. That is to say, not everyone arranges it the same way...
Yes, it's a process fraught with the potential for error....




Ah, so then you did understand (and agree with) my point.
Sometimes it seems that if you had, say, three different projectionists each arranging the framing of a certain movie, they'd each be at least a bit different.
Actually if pressed, I was oversimplifying in hopes of quelling your usual contrarian stance, and attempting to gently steer back to the Dark Sky issue.

Now, since that didn't take - no, I still don't get what you're driving at. It's possible that it can be done badly, so we should be happy with whatever? Old films shouldn't be matted at all cuz they might screw it up? Anyone who's critical in a way unspecific to your own views is wasting their (and the board's) time? Joe Bellicosi just likes to argue? What?

- Jeff