ForgotPassword?
Sign Up
Search this Topic:
Forum Jump
Jan 1 15 8:19 PM
Scathach80 wrote:hermanthegerm wrote: Scathach80 wrote: ...Regarding the Egyptians, one usually distinguishs between the North Africans and the Sub-Saharan Africans. One usually calls them Arabs (other than the Coptics and so forth) since the ancient Egyptians did not speak Arabic. (I will have to check into the situation of a sub-Saharan African disapora in North Africa....Why would you call them Arabs when they are really Egyptian. But anyway do you deny they are Africans? Why would you do that? It seems you haven't really thought some things out here. Show some consistency here, please.Some of them descend from Arab migrations from later years. Would you deny F.W. de Klerk as an African? You would refer to him as such, but qualify it by saying a Hugenot or Boor or Afrikaans.
hermanthegerm wrote: Scathach80 wrote: ...Regarding the Egyptians, one usually distinguishs between the North Africans and the Sub-Saharan Africans. One usually calls them Arabs (other than the Coptics and so forth) since the ancient Egyptians did not speak Arabic. (I will have to check into the situation of a sub-Saharan African disapora in North Africa....Why would you call them Arabs when they are really Egyptian. But anyway do you deny they are Africans? Why would you do that? It seems you haven't really thought some things out here. Show some consistency here, please.
Scathach80 wrote: ...Regarding the Egyptians, one usually distinguishs between the North Africans and the Sub-Saharan Africans. One usually calls them Arabs (other than the Coptics and so forth) since the ancient Egyptians did not speak Arabic. (I will have to check into the situation of a sub-Saharan African disapora in North Africa....
As Egyptians tend to feature Neanderthal DNA, this separates them from sub-Saharan Africans, most of whom sharply lack any Neanderthal DNA, simply representing Cro-Magnon.
Share This