'Frankenstein's Visible Crew Members Must Be Destoryed!' in Hammer Horror Forum

0 Points

Forum Jump

'Frankenstein's Visible Crew Members Must Be Destoryed!'

Author	Comment
HawkeyePierce	'Frankenstein's Visible Crew Members Must Be Destoryed!'	Lead	[-]
Mar 18 12 8:51 AM Reply Quote More My Recent Posts	I'm sure I'm not the first to notice or mention this, but for those of you who haven't - I thought I'd share. A crew member makes an unplanned cameo. Typical, wouldn't have happened at Bray...
Walter Hoover		#1	[-]
Mar 18 12 9:42 AM Reply Quote More My Recent Posts	Something similar happens in LUST FOR A VAMPIRE. In the captures below you'll notice that there are cables, cameras and crew clearly visible for a few seconds at the left hand side of the screen. I think the fellow stood on the yellow box is a camera man, not sure about the one in the white suit. Here's the clip - fast forward to 9' 29''. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fYpN43AmoPY&feature=related
dracsback		#2	[-]
Mar 18 12 12:59 PM Reply Quote More My Recent Posts	That one for LUST is unbelievably obvious and it is surprising they just left it in there. Sloppy film making for sure. And, I guess they didn't have the money to reshoot it. "I saw what I saw when I saw it!"
Walter Hoover		#3	[-]
Mar 18 12 1:15 PM Reply Quote More My Recent Posts	I think you're right about being unable to reshoot the scene. Even if the funds had been available, I doubt the schedule would've allowed them to do the whole thing again. It's unthinkable that this went unnoticed during post-production. It's common knowledge that this picture was beset by various problems - perhaps by the time this !+-up came to light Jimmy Sangster was almost past caring. I read somewhere that shortly after LUST'S release he and Ralph Bates ducked into a cinema in London and were aghast at just how bad the film had turned out. At least they saw the funny side.
Walter Hoover		#4	[-]
Mar 18 12 1:23 PM Reply Quote More My Recent Posts	Didn't realise you can't use the word "c*ck" round here. You live and learn.
HawkeyePierce		#5	[-]
Mar 19 12 9:31 AM Reply Quote More My Recent Posts	I doubt money had anything to do with the 'Lust for a Vampire' goof, If they did notice it in editing (and they must have) they could have just cut it out afterwards or covered it up with a different shot, or quite simply not use that bit of film. There seems to be plenty of coverage, so why bother reshooting? Like Dracsback said...sloppy filmmaking.
Walter Hoover		#6	[-]
Mar 19 12 2:27 PM Reply Quote More My Recent Posts	I can't recall the LUST goof mentioned in Wayne Kinsey's Elstree Years or any of the small number of Hammer books I've read that cover this movie. I think it's worthy of comment because it seems to encapsulate the overall impression of shoddiness that one is left when the end credits roll.
Here 4 help		#7	[-]
Mar 19 12 4:42 PM Reply Quote More My Recent Posts	I reckon they did spot it but assumed the shot was so fleeting that no-one would notice and probbaly didn't have any cover shots to use instead. I certainly missed it on the first viewing and only spotted it after it was pointed out on a forum like this. I've seen worse in bigger budget films - the early Bonds are notorious for bloopers like these. In Goldfinger an unexplained dead body can be briefly seen lying on the floor in the final fight between Bond and Goldfinger in the plane (casualty of a fight presumably edited out of the final cut) and in Thunderball the image has been flipped during the chase around the junket fete and you can see background signs are the wrong way round.
Tumak		#8	[-]
Mar 19 12 5:25 PM Reply Quote More My Recent Posts	Here 4 help wrote: In Goldfinger an unexplained dead body can be briefly seen lying on the floor in the final fight between Bond and Goldfinger in the plane (casualty of a fight presumably edited out of the final cut) Actually, when Goldfinger enters the cabin, you can see the guy standing behind him. Last Edited By: Tumak Mar 19 12 5:36 PM. Edited 1 times.
HawkeyePierce		#9	[-]
Mar 20 12 1:48 PM Reply Quote More My Recent Posts	Now that we're mentioning Bond, my favorite revealing-mistake is from '~~Dracula~~ Man with the Golden Gun'. A mirror gets shifted during a (great) stuntfight and the crew is quite noticeably exposed.
Azazel.shoguntotalwar		#10	[-]
Mar 20 12 2:53 PM Reply Quote More My Recent Posts	Then we have this one from Hammer's The Viking Queen. Patrick Troughton and his chariot-driving son swing around and momentarily reveal this crew van plus rummaging crewmember. I quite like the movie but this sort of thing doesn't help the already struggling production values. Last Edited By: Azazel Mar 20 12 3:00 PM. Edited 4 times.
Here 4 help		#11	[-]
Mar 20 12 3:34 PM Reply Quote More My Recent Posts	Viking Queen is also supposed to be the one in which a character can be seen wearing a wristwatch but I've never managed to spot this and think it is an urban myth (several actors wearing some form of bracelet). Actually, when Goldfinger enters the cabin, you can see the guy standing behind him. Yes - I think they've even blown that shot up to try and hide most of him. They must have wanted to cut that fight out very badly. None of the commentaries or documentaries mention it (the Golden Gun blooper I think is referred to in one of the DVD extras). Last Edited By: Here 4 help Mar 20 12 3:39 PM. Edited 1 times.

<< Previous Topic Next Topic >>

Add Reply

Yuku free message boards

'Frankenstein's Visible Crew Members Must Be Destoryed!'

'Frankenstein's Visible Crew Members Must Be Destoryed!'