ForgotPassword?
Sign Up
Search this Topic:
Forum Jump
Jan 31 11 12:17 AM
Jan 31 11 2:00 PM
kneeteartap wrote:I like the part when Tom Weaver says that this is the first time someone witnesses Talbot's transformation.
Feb 1 11 12:18 AM
skelton knaggs wrote: kneeteartap wrote: I like the part when Tom Weaver says that this is the first time someone witnesses Talbot's transformation.Other than the audience....
kneeteartap wrote: I like the part when Tom Weaver says that this is the first time someone witnesses Talbot's transformation.
Feb 1 11 1:33 AM
Feb 1 11 1:37 AM
Feb 1 11 3:02 AM
robby431 wrote: Ilonka had a pretty good view of his transformation too!
Feb 1 11 5:42 AM
"Guy named Squeamy got thrown from the fifth floor. He's deader'n a mackerel."
Feb 1 11 11:17 PM
Feb 2 11 12:57 AM
Joe Karlosi wrote: Maleva does not see Talbot transform in FMTWM -- he leaps off the wagon before it begins to show, doesn't he?
Feb 2 11 5:09 AM
Feb 2 11 11:52 AM
kneeteartap wrote:I like the part when Tom Weaver says that this is the first time someone witnesses Talbot's transformation
Nov 8 11 3:42 PM
Links To All The Classic Monster Stills I've Posted: http://monsterkidclassichorrorforum.yuku.com/topic/30758
Nov 8 11 11:01 PM
Mar 6 12 9:22 AM
Mar 7 12 9:30 PM
Mar 7 12 10:24 PM
Jul 22 12 1:33 PM
Jul 22 12 5:57 PM
Bobtheman wrote: it is well known that stock footage from Ghost of Frankenstein was used for the ending of House of Dracula regarding the Monster's fate.But I'm wondering if there is written information or documentation as to why this was done. It's certainly not the norm.And I'm wondering if someone could check the shooting script and see what is there compared to what we see on film ( the recycled footage).
Jul 22 12 6:39 PM
Tragg wrote:The re-use of masses of stock footage from older Universal films was very much an ingrained part of the system at Universal in the 1930's and 40's (and even well into the 1970's, when they cannibalised scenes from things like Duel, and built whole new episodes of TV shows - like The Incredible Hulk - around the borrowed footage), and WAS the norm at the studio.Masses of Universal westerns of the 1930's and 40's, not to mention their serials, use vast amounts of key action footage from earlier Uni films; it wasn't uncommon to see a late 30's/early 40's Universal western incorporating grainy, jittery, speeded-up, silent film Indian attack footage. It all saved a few pennies (or more) here and there, and helped the studio stay afloat.So deliberately writing a pulp Frankenstein sequel to include a fiery finish, which could be largely recreated by using material borrowed from a previous Frankie outing, would be standard operating procedure at Universal.
Jul 22 12 6:53 PM
Bobtheman wrote:But I'm wondering if there is written information or documentation as to why this was done. It's certainly not the norm.And I'm wondering if someone could check the shooting script and see what is there compared to what we see on film ( the recycled footage).
Share This