| Author | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
TomWeaver999 |
|||
|
Thank goodness monster mags weren't first published in the FLINTSTONES days of stone slabs or I guess THOSE would be the "real" monster
magazines!
|
|||
FAMOUSMONSTERS62 |
|||
Rick wrote:I'm just saying in my area (Kansas City, MO.) a gallon of milk 2 % is $ 2.69 and a dozen eggs is about $1.49
I bid you Welcome!!!
Kevin AKA (FAMOUSMONSTERS62) |
|||
Scaremail |
|||
TomWeaver999 wrote:Can you imagine the cost of shipping of those stone slabs and the hand engraving costs??!! Now that's SCARY! |
|||
Scaremail |
|||
Rick wrote:Is there a magazine called Scary Movies that I'm not aware of? |
|||
Mike Metzler |
|||
TomWeaver999 wrote:Famous Mammoths of Filmland? Flint Monsters of Filmland? Famous Monoliths of Filmland? Famous Mastodons of Filmland? The Frankenstone Monster?
Keep on rockin' in the free world with Just Off Turner! http://justoffturner.com/
|
|||
BlondieJohnson |
|||
TomWeaver999 wrote:
$15.95 for a REAL monster magazine?! Grrrrr ..... you're FIRED! |
|||
Latarnia |
|||
Scaremail wrote: Hmm, MODERN MONSTERS had color centerfolds if I remember correctly. Mirek |
|||
Latarnia |
|||
|
I wonder how many concerned voices over the price of FREAKY MONSTERS would get the magazine if it were a few dollars cheaper? The price is what the price is,
and a reflection of what it costs to produce a magazine with niche appeal on quality paper. People are ready to piss away $20 on a DVD they will maybe watch
once and then store for life, but $15 for a magazine is too much? Or how about pissing away $20 to $30 in a restaurant and not have anything collectible to
hold onto after that or savor? If you value something, you pay for it; if you don't, then its price shouldn't be a concern to you.
Mirek |
|||
luluthebeast |
|||
|
It doesn't concern me at all!
|
|||
Latarnia |
|||
luluthebeast wrote: Yes, and that's why you are posting in the FREAKY MONSTERS thread! Mirek |
|||
Mike Metzler |
|||
Latarnia wrote:Exactly. I've subscribed to Video Watchdog now for 15 years and haven't batted an eyelash when they've had to raise their cover price. I felt the same way when subscribing to Cinefantastique in the mid-late '80s until the STAR TREK thing hit.
Keep on rockin' in the free world with Just Off Turner! http://justoffturner.com/
|
|||
Rick |
|||
Is there a magazine called Scary Movies that I'm not aware of?Uh, yeah, sure there is, it's...it's...hey look behind you, a binkysaur!! I'm just saying in my area (Kansas City, MO.) a gallon of milk 2 % is $ 2.69 and a dozen eggs is about $1.49Nowhere did I say that those food items cost as much as Freaky Monsters, merely that they do cost, and that money must be spent on necessities first. I wonder how many concerned voices over the price of FREAKY MONSTERS would get the magazine if it were a few dollars cheaper? The price is what the price is, and a reflection of what it costs to produce a magazine with niche appeal on quality paper. People are ready to piss away $20 on a DVD they will maybe watch once and then store for life, but $15 for a magazine is too much? Or how about pissing away $20 to $30 in a restaurant and not have anything collectible to hold onto after that or savor? If you value something, you pay for it; if you don't, then its price shouldn't be a concern to you.As I wrote earlier, I was interested in trying Freaky Monsters, to give it a chance. But, at that price, no way. And no niche magazine looks better on better paper than Monsters from the Vault. It is expensive, but not that much. Plus, it has years of proving to me its indispensability. I buy a few DVDs, but, again, only those for which I feel the true need of ownership--and NEVER at $20. If ISLAND OF LOST SOULS shows up at $19.99, I'll wait for a used copy. If it's $9.99 then it's probably something I could buy without feeling guilty. And I never spend $20-30 in a restaurant because I cannot afford to. If I eat out, it's cheap and carefully considered. And all I have to show for it is another day of sustenance. If Freaky Monsters hangs around, and if I get a look and then feel I must have it, then, yes, maybe I'd bite the bullet and fork over the dineros. But not for a look-see, no thankee. |
|||
Cinemacabre |
|||
|
"Or how about pissing away $20 to $30 in a restaurant and not have anything collectible to hold onto after that or savor?"
With luck, the only collectibility factor will be that it's the one and only issue of Freaky Monsters printed. D'Entre les Morts,
|
|||
Latarnia |
|||
Cinemacabre wrote: And a pleasant day to you, too! Mirek |
|||
thehorrorboy |
|||
Latarnia wrote: I think there's some sort of theory, or rule, of salesmanship that says that if you enjoy your purchase, then you'll remain happy with it long after you've forgotten how much it cost. |
|||
Omega Man |
|||
|
No matter how good they may be in terms of quality, printed "niche"magazines must be published on a dependably regular schedule -- like
clockwork, be it monthly, quarterly, etcetera. Not many people will subscribe to a mag with an irregular publishing schedule. (How many issues will I get
this year?)
By no means do I look upon it as a good thing, but the sad fact is printed magazines (of any kind) are probably mortally wounded at this point anyway. It's the Internet... or die. |
|||
BijouBob8mm |
|||
Thank goodness monster mags weren't first published in the FLINTSTONES days of stone slabs or I guess THOSE would be the "real" monster magazines!Some of those prehistoric cave paintings have some scary critters in them. Maybe they do qualify as the first printed horror. I wonder how many concerned voices over the price of FREAKY MONSTERS would get the magazine if it were a few dollars cheaper?Not an attack on Connie or Ray (nor a criticism of Latarnia), but I think there are some here that really were being sincere. There are some who have a limited amount of disposable income for entertainment. If they can get 2 or 3 magazines for $15, or just 1, some will lean toward getting more. Latarnia's observation about spending $20 on a DVD and then only watching it once is a good one, as there are many who do that. But, given the nature of this Board, I think we find more of that kind of collector here than we do among the mainstream consumers. (Let's face it, we can be an obsessive lot in these parts...and I'm no exception.) But I'm noticing an increasing trend among people I know to either pick up a former rental copy of something when the video store sells it cheap, or to browse the pawn shops and Ebay for bargains rather than pay full price for a DVD. I know the local rental stores and libraries are starting to get more and more requests to carry certain Eurohorror and Criterian titles (the stuff you can't pick up at Walmart or have to pay top dollar for elsewhere) because some fans are starting to tighten their belts and have cut back on what they're actually purchasing. (If the library carries it, then no need to buy it.) And I've heard other areas are seeing an increase in requests at their libraries, as well. (Not just video titles, but also magazines. I'd been seeing things like Starlog and Fangoria show up in a number of libraries for quite some time...and at least one library had even started carrying Playboy...seems like Video Watchdog was also on hand.) We've seen BCI fade away and boutique DVD labels complain of poor sales, we've seen Starlog go to online publishing...I think, at least for a while, entertainment purchases in general are going to become more and more judicious. As I said in a previous post, I don't know how good a time this is for any new specialty magazine to make its debut. None of my comments were intended as a comment on Ray & Connie (or their attempts to use high quality materials), but simply a comment on the times we currently live in and how that will impact both seller and consumer mentality. |
|||
Scaremail |
|||
Yes, MODERN MONSTERS did have color inserts and FAMOUS MONSTERS experimented with a few color pages for awhile. In fact, at least one issue of SCARY MONSTERS had a full color centerfold of a rare HOW TO MAKE A MONSTER promo comic book story. The ENORMOUS TWENTY-EIGHTH ISSUE! of SCARY MONSTERS contained 200 pages of monster fun and cost $6.95 in Sept. 1998. What a Scary Deal! Just as today's packed issues of SM are... |
|||
EDITOR MFTV |
|||
Omega Man wrote:Why spend all the time and effort to give something away on the Internet? I'll keep publishing a hard copy magazine until I'm tired of it and people quit supporting it (neither which has happened yet). However, there are no plans for a Internet version of Monsters from the Vault. If you want a Internet monster magazine read Monster Kid (Kerry does a great job!).
Jim Clatterbaugh
Editor/Publisher MFTV www.monstersfromthevault.com |
|||
Wich2 |
|||
|
Connie has always been decent here; and I've said it a million times, I am neither a Ferry NOR Forry worshiper.
I do feel, though, that the last-minute, after-the-big-compromise name change for the mag was not, as A.C. Doyle used to say, "quite playing the game." Many of us in the Lonely Middle hoped that the wasted years of pissing matches were over; but printing a competing "F.M." that looks just like the old one, just does not seem like a fair response to the terms of the settlement with Kim. I had much more interest in a SHOCK CLASSICS, that I'd hoped might have had a slightly fresher "flavor." Instead of that, Monster Kiddom has the exciting prospect for dueling "FM 3.0" and "FM 2.5" 's... |
|||