ForgotPassword?
Sign Up
Search this Topic:
Forum Jump
Feb 13 15 6:55 PM
Feb 13 15 7:11 PM
oregan wrote:I just want to interject that I think it's wonderful that this work has produced such a lively discussion on this film.
Feb 13 15 7:47 PM
Feb 13 15 8:31 PM
Feb 13 15 8:42 PM
Feb 13 15 9:11 PM
Feb 13 15 9:19 PM
cjh5801 wrote:He's usually pretty good at giving us an endnote for his research. His scholarship is very meticulous.
Feb 13 15 9:58 PM
Feb 13 15 10:28 PM
Feb 13 15 11:29 PM
Feb 14 15 12:26 AM
Feb 14 15 12:34 AM
Feb 14 15 3:37 AM
Feb 14 15 8:20 AM
Feb 14 15 9:44 AM
Feb 14 15 9:56 AM
Rick wrote:atkalu wrote:To this day, I have watched around 15-20 1920s-1940s horror films on the big screen with modern audiences. The ONLY and I repeat ONLY time the audience didn't applaud at the ending was when I saw DRACULA - and this happened TWICE. I saw at the Film Forum in the 1990s. I saw it again about a decade later (can't remember the location) and the same response. I thought it was clearly because the second half just isn't very interesting or fun. DOCTOR X had people rolling with laughter ("Synthetic Flesh!"), THE BLACK CAT had people cheering at the battle of the titans (Karloff vs. Lugosi) and the Lewton films left people just flat-out impressed. It is not a stretch to say that that DRACULA lets people down. I just have to say that I've had a much different experience in my big-screen viewings of DRACULA. I've seen it in theaters at least 4 times, maybe more. The two or three oldest viewings I don't remember that well. But the others I do.I saw DRACULA at a small rep theater in Cincinnati on February 14, 1981 which, in those unenlightened days, was thought to be the 50th anniversary of the premiere. There were some jokers in the audience who wanted to laugh, but they soon shut up. I wrote a little remembrance after the viewing in which I commented on how rapt the audience seemed to be by Lugosi. I don't remember if there was applause or not, but I do recall appreciative mutters from audience members as we exited.Then on Halloween night 2012, I saw DRACULA and FRANKENSTEIN at a theater in Toronto. The place was full, mostly with younger sorts, teens and twenties, many of them in costume. I was astounded that the movie not only was treated with respect, but it played like gangbusters. The only unwanted laughs were on some of those extra-tight closeups of Lugosi. Dwight Frye's every scene played to stony silence, except for a kind of "brrrr" from one of the ladies in attendance. Astoundingly, even the "humor" of Martin the orderly got laughs exactly where intended. And, at the end, a huge burst of applause and even some whistling and cheering. I couldn't have been more pleased.
atkalu wrote:To this day, I have watched around 15-20 1920s-1940s horror films on the big screen with modern audiences. The ONLY and I repeat ONLY time the audience didn't applaud at the ending was when I saw DRACULA - and this happened TWICE. I saw at the Film Forum in the 1990s. I saw it again about a decade later (can't remember the location) and the same response. I thought it was clearly because the second half just isn't very interesting or fun. DOCTOR X had people rolling with laughter ("Synthetic Flesh!"), THE BLACK CAT had people cheering at the battle of the titans (Karloff vs. Lugosi) and the Lewton films left people just flat-out impressed. It is not a stretch to say that that DRACULA lets people down.
Feb 14 15 10:24 AM
EDITOR MFTV wrote:Allen Champion wrote:Still waiting for Amazon to deliver . . . . . looks like I'll have to celebrate the 84th with the Blu Ray! I just ordered the book on Monday from Amazon and it arrived on Tuesday, wonder what the delay is with your (and a few others here) order.
Allen Champion wrote:Still waiting for Amazon to deliver . . . . . looks like I'll have to celebrate the 84th with the Blu Ray!
Feb 14 15 1:13 PM
Casey62 wrote:...I also question calling the re-edit the 'purist' version.
Feb 14 15 1:27 PM
Casey62 wrote:I'm not discounting that Browning may have been dissatisfied with the release version. But what was it he allegedly didn't like? Did he regret the choices made during production and wish he would have stuck more to the script? In other words, just because Browning may have been dissatisfied doesn't necessarily mean a modern re-edit as we see it would meet with his approval either.
Feb 14 15 2:41 PM
Share This