<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">

	<channel>
	  <!-- main channel info -->
        <title>TOWER OF LONDON (1962), THE OBLONG BOX (1969) </title>
        <link>http://monsterkidclassichorrorforum.yuku.com/topic/43250/TOWER-OF-LONDON-1962-THE-OBLONG-BOX-1969</link>
        <description>
        <![CDATA[ The strongest resemblance between 1962’s TOWER OF LONDON and 1969’s OBLONG BOX is that both are tangentially based on works by esteemed literary authors, though both were aimed at a 20th-century horror-film audience.  Further, according to my system, both films are works of “the uncanny,” though the literary originals were both of a “naturalistic” phenomenality—in contrast, say, to the way HAMLET, an “uncanny” play, was adapted into a work with the same phenomenality.There’s also a more... ]]>
        </description>

		<!-- optional elements -->
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2011, Yuku</copyright>
		<managingEditor>feeds@yuku.com (FeedMaster)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>webmaster@yuku.com (WebMaster)</webMaster>
		<!-- note: dates need to be RFC 822 formated "Sat, 07 Sep 2002 00:00:01 GMT" -->
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 22:07:33 GMT</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2012 20:30:18 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>Kickapps Feeds 1.0</generator>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<ttl>60</ttl>

		<rating>
		{pics-1.1 &quot;http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) &quot;http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 ))
		</rating>
		<textInput>
			<title>Search</title>
			<description>Search Domain</description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://yuku.com/search/direct/</link>
		</textInput>
		<!-- skip
		<skipHours>
			<hour>23</hour>
		</skipHours>
		<skipDays>
			<day>Monday</day>
			<day>Wednesday</day>
			<day>Friday</day>
		</skipDays>-->
		<!-- extensions -->


		<!-- channel items -->
		<!-- descriptions should be shorter than 500 char to be polite -->
		<!-- html shoud be stripped or escaped -->
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: TOWER OF LONDON (1962), THE OBLONG BOX (1969)  ]]></title>
			<link>http://monsterkidclassichorrorforum.yuku.com/reply/823537/TOWER-OF-LONDON-1962-THE-OBLONG-BOX-1969#reply-823537</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I find that The Oblong Box plays well as a drama, or intense melodrama (whatever ), with supernaturap trappings rather than  as a horror. There's an emotional intensity to it that somehow makes it feel real, not that much like a horror, the casting of Pri...<br /><a href="http://monsterkidclassichorrorforum.yuku.com/reply/823537/TOWER-OF-LONDON-1962-THE-OBLONG-BOX-1969#reply-823537">Read More</a> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (telegonus)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://monsterkidclassichorrorforum.yuku.com/reply/823537</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2012 20:30:17 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ TOWER OF LONDON (1962), THE OBLONG BOX (1969)  ]]></title>
			<link>http://monsterkidclassichorrorforum.yuku.com/topic/43250/TOWER-OF-LONDON-1962-THE-OBLONG-BOX-1969</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ The strongest resemblance between 1962’s TOWER OF LONDON and 1969’s OBLONG BOX is that both are tangentially based on works by esteemed literary authors, though both were aimed at a 20th-century horror-film audience.  Further, according to my system, ...<br /><a href="http://monsterkidclassichorrorforum.yuku.com/topic/43250/TOWER-OF-LONDON-1962-THE-OBLONG-BOX-1969">Read More</a> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (gene phillips)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://monsterkidclassichorrorforum.yuku.com/topic/43250</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 22:07:33 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
    <!-- end items -->

  </channel>
</rss>
