<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">

	<channel>
	  <!-- main channel info -->
        <title>rate the new STAR TREK reboot (2009)</title>
        <link>http://monsterkidclassichorrorforum.yuku.com/topic/23683/rate-the-new-STAR-TREK-reboot-2009</link>
        <description>
        <![CDATA[ Rate the reboot in relation to the original Star Trek series (1966-69) on which it is based.

On a scale of 1 to 5, with 1 being the lowest and 5 being the highest quality.

There is also a sub-zero for those purists who, well, you know.


Richard ]]>
        </description>

		<!-- optional elements -->
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2011, Yuku</copyright>
		<managingEditor>feeds@yuku.com (FeedMaster)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>webmaster@yuku.com (WebMaster)</webMaster>
		<!-- note: dates need to be RFC 822 formated "Sat, 07 Sep 2002 00:00:01 GMT" -->
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 05:34:13 GMT</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 10:14:54 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>Kickapps Feeds 1.0</generator>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<ttl>60</ttl>

		<rating>
		{pics-1.1 &quot;http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) &quot;http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 ))
		</rating>
		<textInput>
			<title>Search</title>
			<description>Search Domain</description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://yuku.com/search/direct/</link>
		</textInput>
		<!-- skip
		<skipHours>
			<hour>23</hour>
		</skipHours>
		<skipDays>
			<day>Monday</day>
			<day>Wednesday</day>
			<day>Friday</day>
		</skipDays>-->
		<!-- extensions -->


		<!-- channel items -->
		<!-- descriptions should be shorter than 500 char to be polite -->
		<!-- html shoud be stripped or escaped -->
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: rate the new STAR TREK reboot (2009) ]]></title>
			<link>http://monsterkidclassichorrorforum.yuku.com/reply/874340/rate-the-new-STAR-TREK-reboot-2009#reply-874340</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Wich2 wrote:Now see, I agree that Abrams and Meyer both got creative with some Details - but I think Meyer found and burnished the Core more effectively.I'll certainly buy that.&nbsp; ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (bela lugosi)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://monsterkidclassichorrorforum.yuku.com/reply/874340</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2012 14:37:55 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: rate the new STAR TREK reboot (2009) ]]></title>
			<link>http://monsterkidclassichorrorforum.yuku.com/reply/874168/rate-the-new-STAR-TREK-reboot-2009#reply-874168</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ i did not like the focus on action as opposed to thought provoking story.i have grown in my enjoyment of the 2009 movie  but it doesn`t touch the original series.however it is STAR TREK for this generation i guess. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (flashback)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://monsterkidclassichorrorforum.yuku.com/reply/874168</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2012 01:43:24 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: rate the new STAR TREK reboot (2009) ]]></title>
			<link>http://monsterkidclassichorrorforum.yuku.com/reply/874167/rate-the-new-STAR-TREK-reboot-2009#reply-874167</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Now see, I agree that Abrams and Meyer both got creative with some Details - but I think Meyer found and burnished the Core more effectively. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Wich2)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://monsterkidclassichorrorforum.yuku.com/reply/874167</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2012 01:34:30 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: rate the new STAR TREK reboot (2009) ]]></title>
			<link>http://monsterkidclassichorrorforum.yuku.com/reply/722220/rate-the-new-STAR-TREK-reboot-2009#reply-722220</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I rated it "Good".  I didn't think I'd like it much at all, but then I realized Nimoy was in it, so I figured I'd like at least that much, and indeed I did.  I liked quite a bit more about it as well, but it didn't hold up for me to repeated viewings.   A...<br /><a href="http://monsterkidclassichorrorforum.yuku.com/reply/722220/rate-the-new-STAR-TREK-reboot-2009#reply-722220">Read More</a> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (bela lugosi)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://monsterkidclassichorrorforum.yuku.com/reply/722220</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 22:20:06 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: rate the new STAR TREK reboot (2009) ]]></title>
			<link>http://monsterkidclassichorrorforum.yuku.com/reply/669462/rate-the-new-STAR-TREK-reboot-2009#reply-669462</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Uchujin65,

I loved the clean look and felt it went along with the original conception.  I'm not a Trekkie or whatever but I enjoyed the original show when I saw it years ago, and the completely unrealistic look of it was one of the things I enjoyed.  T...<br /><a href="http://monsterkidclassichorrorforum.yuku.com/reply/669462/rate-the-new-STAR-TREK-reboot-2009#reply-669462">Read More</a> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Jonatwork)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://monsterkidclassichorrorforum.yuku.com/reply/669462</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2011 04:12:26 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: rate the new STAR TREK reboot (2009) ]]></title>
			<link>http://monsterkidclassichorrorforum.yuku.com/reply/668046/rate-the-new-STAR-TREK-reboot-2009#reply-668046</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I didn't like it. Not a J.J. Abrams fan. He made it too dark for my taste. Now normally I love the dark and slightly twisted modernization thing. The dark and gritty thing works wonderfully for Batman or Star Wars (the prequels weren't gritty enough), not...<br /><a href="http://monsterkidclassichorrorforum.yuku.com/reply/668046/rate-the-new-STAR-TREK-reboot-2009#reply-668046">Read More</a> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Uchujin65)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://monsterkidclassichorrorforum.yuku.com/reply/668046</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2010 17:31:01 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: rate the new STAR TREK reboot (2009) ]]></title>
			<link>http://monsterkidclassichorrorforum.yuku.com/reply/654374/rate-the-new-STAR-TREK-reboot-2009#reply-654374</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ This was probably the most enjoyable film I saw in the theater last year.  I liked the first STAR TREK series but everything after that I've either tolerated or hated, with a few exceptions.

What I found truly refreshing was the sense I got that Abrams...<br /><a href="http://monsterkidclassichorrorforum.yuku.com/reply/654374/rate-the-new-STAR-TREK-reboot-2009#reply-654374">Read More</a> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Jonatwork)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://monsterkidclassichorrorforum.yuku.com/reply/654374</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 20:09:36 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: rate the new STAR TREK reboot (2009) ]]></title>
			<link>http://monsterkidclassichorrorforum.yuku.com/reply/647148/rate-the-new-STAR-TREK-reboot-2009#reply-647148</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I quite enjoyed it. I went in fully expecting to see a Muppet Babies style bastardiztion of my beloved sci-fi universe, and came out riding on my happy little geek cloud.

A "very good" from me. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Dr Criddle)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://monsterkidclassichorrorforum.yuku.com/reply/647148</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 23:09:05 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: rate the new STAR TREK reboot (2009) ]]></title>
			<link>http://monsterkidclassichorrorforum.yuku.com/reply/537237/rate-the-new-STAR-TREK-reboot-2009#reply-537237</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I completely agree, blackbiped. This film is really well made, and despite its enormous task of trying to live up to the original series, not only holds its own, but surpasses every other series, and all the original cast films, save Wrath of Kahn. A real...<br /><a href="http://monsterkidclassichorrorforum.yuku.com/reply/537237/rate-the-new-STAR-TREK-reboot-2009#reply-537237">Read More</a> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (delgadosaur)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://monsterkidclassichorrorforum.yuku.com/reply/537237</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 20:06:04 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: rate the new STAR TREK reboot (2009) ]]></title>
			<link>http://monsterkidclassichorrorforum.yuku.com/reply/523656/rate-the-new-STAR-TREK-reboot-2009#reply-523656</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I rated it &quot;very good.&quot; Despite my initial reservations, I had a great time on first (theatrical) viewing and have watched it at least six more times
since buying the DVD a week ago. There are still things that bug me about it but they&#39;re ou...<br /><a href="http://monsterkidclassichorrorforum.yuku.com/reply/523656/rate-the-new-STAR-TREK-reboot-2009#reply-523656">Read More</a> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (blackbiped)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://monsterkidclassichorrorforum.yuku.com/reply/523656</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 20:52:11 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: rate the new STAR TREK reboot (2009) ]]></title>
			<link>http://monsterkidclassichorrorforum.yuku.com/reply/523447/rate-the-new-STAR-TREK-reboot-2009#reply-523447</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I rated it POOR because of:


&quot;Spock Prime&quot; as in who the hell needs him?

the constant winking white lights

the poorly designed bridge

the overall idiocy of the characters

the underdeveloped and flashed-by story threads

the concept of rippe...<br /><a href="http://monsterkidclassichorrorforum.yuku.com/reply/523447/rate-the-new-STAR-TREK-reboot-2009#reply-523447">Read More</a> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Richard)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://monsterkidclassichorrorforum.yuku.com/reply/523447</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 15:36:31 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: rate the new STAR TREK reboot (2009) ]]></title>
			<link>http://monsterkidclassichorrorforum.yuku.com/reply/502951/rate-the-new-STAR-TREK-reboot-2009#reply-502951</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Wait a sec, Oh.....you&#39;re talkin&#39; &#39;bout the NEW MOVIE.

Methought it was the TOS revamped.

Moi bad.


Stay on groovin&#39; safari,

Tor ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (TORHERSHMAN)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://monsterkidclassichorrorforum.yuku.com/reply/502951</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 06:12:55 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: rate the new STAR TREK reboot (2009) ]]></title>
			<link>http://monsterkidclassichorrorforum.yuku.com/reply/502950/rate-the-new-STAR-TREK-reboot-2009#reply-502950</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Moi did not know of the updated versions and first one moi saw was the &#39;Spock Bone-On&#39; episode, where they meet TaPow on Vulcan.

The added scenes blew moi&#39;s mind; of course, that&#39;s an act NOT requirin&#39; an H bomb.


Stay on groovin&#39...<br /><a href="http://monsterkidclassichorrorforum.yuku.com/reply/502950/rate-the-new-STAR-TREK-reboot-2009#reply-502950">Read More</a> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (TORHERSHMAN)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://monsterkidclassichorrorforum.yuku.com/reply/502950</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 06:10:54 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: rate the new STAR TREK reboot (2009) ]]></title>
			<link>http://monsterkidclassichorrorforum.yuku.com/reply/462379/rate-the-new-STAR-TREK-reboot-2009#reply-462379</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I kind of liked it- some major paradoxical plot holes(Can&#39;t Spock Prime use the Guardian of Forever to correct his mistake/Can&#39;t he use his knowledge
of future events and prevent the destruction of Romuluses sun-thus nulling this parallel universe...<br /><a href="http://monsterkidclassichorrorforum.yuku.com/reply/462379/rate-the-new-STAR-TREK-reboot-2009#reply-462379">Read More</a> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (sutekh66)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://monsterkidclassichorrorforum.yuku.com/reply/462379</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 22:18:49 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: rate the new STAR TREK reboot (2009) ]]></title>
			<link>http://monsterkidclassichorrorforum.yuku.com/reply/430303/rate-the-new-STAR-TREK-reboot-2009#reply-430303</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ One quabble I have, which is lame, is Kirk having blue eyes. Silly, I know. I like the set-up of the alternate universe and the parallels to Kirk and Spock
(each lose a parent). I almost wish they had stuck with the original characterization of Kirk (Gary...<br /><a href="http://monsterkidclassichorrorforum.yuku.com/reply/430303/rate-the-new-STAR-TREK-reboot-2009#reply-430303">Read More</a> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Strockstar)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://monsterkidclassichorrorforum.yuku.com/reply/430303</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 00:58:35 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ rate the new STAR TREK reboot (2009) ]]></title>
			<link>http://monsterkidclassichorrorforum.yuku.com/topic/23683/rate-the-new-STAR-TREK-reboot-2009</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Rate the reboot in relation to the original Star Trek series (1966-69) on which it is based.

On a scale of 1 to 5, with 1 being the lowest and 5 being the highest quality.

There is also a sub-zero for those purists who, well, you know.


Richard ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Richard)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://monsterkidclassichorrorforum.yuku.com/topic/23683</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 05:34:13 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
    <!-- end items -->

  </channel>
</rss>
